Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
70.4/ 100B
Performance52· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display77· 18%
MacBook Pro 14 M4 ProAPPLERENDER
Probe B
Apple
MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro
63.7/ 100C
Performance56· 35%
Battery & Ports74· 27%
Design· 20%
Display62· 18%
Quick verdict

Between the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) and MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) comes out ahead in storage / refresh rate, while the MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro wins on claimed battery life / ram. Overall, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 70.4 and the MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro scores 63.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The TUF Gaming A16 (2024) edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 63.7), but the 6.7-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are storage, refresh rate, battery, among others.

Pick the MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are claimed battery life, ram, cpu cores, among others.

Both ship with comparable backlit keyboard, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins

  • Storage — 100.00% more. 1024 GB vs 512 GB.
  • Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Battery — 25.00% more. 90 Wh vs 72 Wh.
  • Screen size — 12.68% more. 16 " vs 14.2 ".

Why Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro wins

  • Claimed battery life — 120.00% more. 22 h vs 10 h.
  • RAM — 50.00% more. 24 GB vs 16 GB.
  • CPU cores — 50.00% more. 12 vs 8.
  • Thunderbolt ports — 3.00 more. 3 vs 0.
  • Weight — 0.65 kg less. 1.55 vs 2.2.
  • Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro
Weight2.2 kg1.55 kglead
Thickness26.9 mm15.5 mmlead
Build materialplasticaluminum
Backlit keyboardtruetrue
Fingerprint readerfalsetruelead

Display

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro
Screen size16 "lead14.2 "
Refresh rate165 Hzlead120 Hz
Panel typeIPSOLEDlead

Performance

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro
CPUAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSApple M4 Pro
CPU cores812lead
GPUAMD Radeon RX 7700SApple M4 Pro 16-core GPU
RAM16 GB24 GBlead
Storage1024 GBlead512 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD

Battery & Ports

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro
Battery90 Whlead72 Wh
Claimed battery life10 h22 hlead
USB-C ports23lead
Thunderbolt ports03lead
HDMItruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro?+

MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro claims up to 22 hours — 10h vs 22h.

Which is lighter, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro?+

MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro is lighter at 1.55 kg vs 2.2 kg.

Which has more RAM, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro?+

MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro offers 24GB of RAM.

Which has an OLED display, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro?+

MacBook Pro 14 M4 Pro has an OLED display; TUF Gaming A16 (2024) uses IPS.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.