ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)
Between the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) and Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025), the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) comes out ahead in refresh rate / battery, while the Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) wins on claimed battery life / cpu cores. Overall, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 70.4 and the Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) scores 63.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The TUF Gaming A16 (2024) edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 63.6), but the 6.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, battery, screen size.
Pick the Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are claimed battery life, cpu cores, weight, among others.
Both ship with comparable ram, storage, thunderbolt ports, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Battery — 20.00% more. 90 Wh vs 75 Wh.
- ▲Screen size — 14.29% more. 16 " vs 14 ".
Why ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) wins
- ▲Claimed battery life — 60.00% more. 16 h vs 10 h.
- ▲CPU cores — 25.00% more. 10 vs 8.
- ▲Weight — 0.90 kg less. 1.3 vs 2.2.
- ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) | ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 1.3 kglead |
| Thickness | 26.9 mm | 13.9 mmlead |
| Build material | plastic | aluminum |
| Backlit keyboard | true | true |
| Fingerprint reader | false | truelead |
Display
| Spec | ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) | ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 16 "lead | 14 " |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 165 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | OLEDlead |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) | ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10lead |
| GPUⓘ | AMD Radeon RX 7700S | AMD Radeon 880M |
| RAMⓘ | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storageⓘ | 1024 GB | 1024 GB |
| Storage typeⓘ | SSD | SSD |
Battery & Ports
| Spec | ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) | ASUS - Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Batteryⓘ | 90 Whlead | 75 Wh |
| Claimed battery life | 10 h | 16 hlead |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| Thunderbolt portsⓘ | 0 | 0 |
| HDMI | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery life, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)?+
Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) claims up to 16 hours — 10h vs 16h.
Which is lighter, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)?+
Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) is lighter at 1.3 kg vs 2.2 kg.
Which has an OLED display, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025)?+
Vivobook S 14 OLED (2025) has an OLED display; TUF Gaming A16 (2024) uses IPS.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.