Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs Lenovo - Yoga 9i Gen 9

Last updated · How Mars Score works
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
70.4/ 100B
Performance52· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display77· 18%
Yoga 9i Gen 9LENOVORENDER
Probe B
Lenovo
Yoga 9i Gen 9
65.9/ 100C
Performance60· 35%
Battery & Ports76· 27%
Design· 20%
Display61· 18%
Quick verdict

Between the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) and Yoga 9i Gen 9, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) comes out ahead in refresh rate / battery, while the Yoga 9i Gen 9 wins on cpu cores / claimed battery life. Overall, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 70.4 and the Yoga 9i Gen 9 scores 65.9 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The TUF Gaming A16 (2024) edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 65.9), but the 4.5-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, battery, screen size.

Pick the Yoga 9i Gen 9 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are cpu cores, claimed battery life, thunderbolt ports, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, storage, backlit keyboard, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins

  • Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Battery — 20.00% more. 90 Wh vs 75 Wh.
  • Screen size — 14.29% more. 16 " vs 14 ".

Why Lenovo - Yoga 9i Gen 9 wins

  • CPU cores — 100.00% more. 16 vs 8.
  • Claimed battery life — 50.00% more. 15 h vs 10 h.
  • Thunderbolt ports — 2.00 more. 2 vs 0.
  • Weight — 0.84 kg less. 1.36 vs 2.2.
  • Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Lenovo - Yoga 9i Gen 9
Weight2.2 kg1.36 kglead
Thickness26.9 mm16 mmlead
Build materialplasticaluminum
Backlit keyboardtruetrue
Fingerprint readerfalsetruelead

Display

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Lenovo - Yoga 9i Gen 9
Screen size16 "lead14 "
Refresh rate165 Hzlead120 Hz
Panel typeIPSOLEDlead

Performance

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Lenovo - Yoga 9i Gen 9
CPUAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
CPU cores816lead
GPUAMD Radeon RX 7700SIntel Arc Graphics
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage1024 GB1024 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD

Battery & Ports

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Lenovo - Yoga 9i Gen 9
Battery90 Whlead75 Wh
Claimed battery life10 h15 hlead
USB-C ports22
Thunderbolt ports02lead
HDMItrueleadfalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Yoga 9i Gen 9?+

Yoga 9i Gen 9 claims up to 15 hours — 10h vs 15h.

Which is lighter, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Yoga 9i Gen 9?+

Yoga 9i Gen 9 is lighter at 1.36 kg vs 2.2 kg.

Which has an OLED display, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Yoga 9i Gen 9?+

Yoga 9i Gen 9 has an OLED display; TUF Gaming A16 (2024) uses IPS.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.