Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs ASUS - Zenbook S 14 UX5406

Last updated · How Mars Score works
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
70.4/ 100B
Performance52· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display77· 18%
Zenbook S 14 UX5406ASUSRENDER
Probe B
ASUS
Zenbook S 14 UX5406
64.2/ 100C
Performance58· 35%
Battery & Ports74· 27%
Design· 20%
Display61· 18%
Quick verdict

Between the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) and Zenbook S 14 UX5406, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) comes out ahead in refresh rate / battery, while the Zenbook S 14 UX5406 wins on ram / claimed battery life. Overall, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 70.4 and the Zenbook S 14 UX5406 scores 64.2 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The TUF Gaming A16 (2024) edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 64.2), but the 6.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, battery, screen size.

Pick the Zenbook S 14 UX5406 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are ram, claimed battery life, thunderbolt ports, among others.

Both ship with comparable storage, cpu cores, backlit keyboard, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins

  • Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Battery — 25.00% more. 90 Wh vs 72 Wh.
  • Screen size — 14.29% more. 16 " vs 14 ".

Why ASUS - Zenbook S 14 UX5406 wins

  • RAM — 100.00% more. 32 GB vs 16 GB.
  • Claimed battery life — 60.00% more. 16 h vs 10 h.
  • Thunderbolt ports — 2.00 more. 2 vs 0.
  • Weight — 1.00 kg less. 1.20 vs 2.2.
  • Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUS - Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Weight2.2 kg1.20 kglead
Thickness26.9 mm11.9 mmlead
Build materialplasticceraluminum
Backlit keyboardtruetrue
Fingerprint readerfalsetruelead

Display

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUS - Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Screen size16 "lead14 "
Refresh rate165 Hzlead120 Hz
Panel typeIPSOLEDlead

Performance

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUS - Zenbook S 14 UX5406
CPUAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSIntel Core Ultra 7 258V
CPU cores88
GPUAMD Radeon RX 7700SIntel Arc 140V
RAM16 GB32 GBlead
Storage1024 GB1024 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD

Battery & Ports

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUS - Zenbook S 14 UX5406
Battery90 Whlead72 Wh
Claimed battery life10 h16 hlead
USB-C ports22
Thunderbolt ports02lead
HDMItruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Zenbook S 14 UX5406?+

Zenbook S 14 UX5406 claims up to 16 hours — 10h vs 16h.

Which is lighter, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Zenbook S 14 UX5406?+

Zenbook S 14 UX5406 is lighter at 1.20 kg vs 2.2 kg.

Which has more RAM, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Zenbook S 14 UX5406?+

Zenbook S 14 UX5406 offers 32GB of RAM.

Which has an OLED display, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Zenbook S 14 UX5406?+

Zenbook S 14 UX5406 has an OLED display; TUF Gaming A16 (2024) uses IPS.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.