Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Apple - Beats Fit Pro | Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery — buds | 6 h | 8 h |
| Battery — with case | 24 h | 27 h |
| Driver size | 9.5 mm | 10 mm |
| Multipoint | false | true |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | IP57 |
| Weight per bud | 5.6 g | 5.7 g |
Between the Beats Fit Pro and Elite 10 Gen 2, the Beats Fit Pro comes out ahead in weight per bud, while the Elite 10 Gen 2 wins on battery — buds / battery — with case. Overall, the Beats Fit Pro scores 71.6 and the Elite 10 Gen 2 scores 76.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Elite 10 Gen 2 edges ahead on the Mars Score (71.6 vs 76.5), but the 4.9-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Beats Fit Pro if you care most about weight per bud. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight per bud. The single most decisive one: Weight per bud — 0.10 g less. 5.6 vs 5.7.
Pick the Elite 10 Gen 2 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are battery — buds, battery — with case, driver size, among others. The single most decisive one: Battery — buds — 33.33% more. 8 h vs 6 h.
Both ship with comparable active noise cancellation, spatial audio, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Apple - Beats Fit Pro or Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2?
Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 leads the current Mars Score by 4.9 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare driver size, battery — buds, weight per bud against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Apple - Beats Fit Pro if…
Apple - Beats Fit Pro has the measurable edge on weight per bud g.
Choose Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 if…
Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 has the measurable edge on battery life buds h, battery life case h, driver size mm.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Apple - Beats Fit Pro wins
- ▲Weight per bud — 0.10 g less. 5.6 vs 5.7.
Why Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 wins
- ▲Battery — buds — 33.33% more. 8 h vs 6 h.
- ▲Battery — with case — 12.50% more. 27 h vs 24 h.
- ▲Driver size — 5.26% more. 10 mm vs 9.5 mm.
- ▲Has Multipoint.
- ▲Water resistance: IP57 (vs IPX4).
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Apple - Beats Fit Pro | Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Form factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Weight per bud | 5.6 glead | 5.7 g |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IPX4 | IP57lead |
Audio
| Spec | Apple - Beats Fit Pro | Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Driver sizeⓘ | 9.5 mm | 10 mmlead |
| Active noise cancellationⓘ | true | true |
| Transparency mode | true | true |
| Spatial audioⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Apple - Beats Fit Pro | Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery — buds | 6 h | 8 hlead |
| Battery — with case | 24 h | 27 hlead |
| Wireless case chargingⓘ | false | truelead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple - Beats Fit Pro | Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetoothⓘ | 5.0 | 5.3lead |
| Codecsⓘ | AAC,SBC | LE Audio,AAC,SBC |
| Multipointⓘ | false | truelead |
| In-ear detection | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has longer battery, Beats Fit Pro or Elite 10 Gen 2?+
Elite 10 Gen 2 lasts 8h per charge vs 6h.
Do Beats Fit Pro or Elite 10 Gen 2 support multipoint?+
Elite 10 Gen 2 supports multipoint pairing; Beats Fit Pro does not.
Which has ANC, Beats Fit Pro or Elite 10 Gen 2?+
Both models have active noise cancellation.