Apple - Beats Studio Pro vs Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Apple - Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 40 h | 60 h |
| Spatial audio | true | false |
| LDAC | false | true |
Between the Beats Studio Pro and Aventho 300, the Beats Studio Pro comes out ahead in spatial audio, while the Aventho 300 wins on battery life / ldac. Overall, the Beats Studio Pro scores 73.5 and the Aventho 300 scores 76.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (73.5 vs 76.4). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Beats Studio Pro if audio quality and feature breadth (ANC, codecs, multipoint) are the lead criteria for your purchase. The biggest gaps in its favor are spatial audio. The single most decisive one: Has Spatial audio.
Pick the Aventho 300 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are battery life, ldac. The single most decisive one: Battery life — 50.00% more. 60 h vs 40 h.
Both ship with comparable driver size, active noise cancellation, weight, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Apple - Beats Studio Pro or Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300?
Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300 leads the current Mars Score by 2.9 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare battery life against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Apple - Beats Studio Pro if…
Apple - Beats Studio Pro has the measurable edge on has spatial audio.
Choose Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300 if…
Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300 has the measurable edge on battery life h, supports ldac.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Apple - Beats Studio Pro wins
- ▲Has Spatial audio.
Why Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300 wins
- ▲Battery life — 50.00% more. 60 h vs 40 h.
- ▲Has LDAC.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Apple - Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | over-ear | over-ear |
| Weight | 260 g | 260 g |
| Water resistance | none | none |
Audio
| Spec | Apple - Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Driver sizeⓘ | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Impedanceⓘ | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivityⓘ | 108 dBlead | 100 dB |
| Active noise cancellationⓘ | true | true |
| Transparency mode | true | true |
| Spatial audioⓘ | truelead | false |
Battery
| Spec | Apple - Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery lifeⓘ | 40 h | 60 hlead |
| Fast chargeⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple - Beats Studio Pro | Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetoothⓘ | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Multipointⓘ | true | true |
| 3.5mm jack | true | true |
| LDACⓘ | false | truelead |
| aptX HDⓘ | false | truelead |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery life, Beats Studio Pro or Aventho 300?+
Aventho 300 lasts 60 hours vs 40 hours.
Do Beats Studio Pro or Aventho 300 have active noise cancellation?+
Both models have active noise cancellation.
Which supports LDAC, Beats Studio Pro or Aventho 300?+
Aventho 300 supports LDAC; Beats Studio Pro does not.