Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Fujifilm - GFX 100 II |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 375 g | 1030 g |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 102 MP |
| AF points | 651 | 425 |
| In-body stabilization | false | true |
| Log profile | false | true |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Medium Format |
Between the EOS R50 and GFX 100 II, the EOS R50 comes out ahead in weight / af points, while the GFX 100 II wins on megapixels / in-body stabilization. Overall, the EOS R50 scores 65.6 and the GFX 100 II scores 81.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The GFX 100 II is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 16.1 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the EOS R50 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, af points. The single most decisive one: Weight — 655.00 g less. 375 vs 1030.
Pick the GFX 100 II if you care most about megapixels / in-body stabilization. Its strongest claims are megapixels, in-body stabilization, log profile, among others. The single most decisive one: Megapixels — 325.00% more. 102 MP vs 24 MP.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the GFX 100 II is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Canon - EOS R50 or Fujifilm - GFX 100 II?
Fujifilm - GFX 100 II leads the current Mars Score by 16.1 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare megapixels, sensor size, max video, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Canon - EOS R50 if…
Canon - EOS R50 has the measurable edge on weight g, af points.
Choose Fujifilm - GFX 100 II if…
Fujifilm - GFX 100 II has the measurable edge on megapixels, has ibis, has log profile.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Canon - EOS R50 wins
- ▲Weight — 655.00 g less. 375 vs 1030.
- ▲AF points — 53.18% more. 651 vs 425.
Why Fujifilm - GFX 100 II wins
- ▲Megapixels — 325.00% more. 102 MP vs 24 MP.
- ▲Has In-body stabilization.
- ▲Has Log profile.
- ▲Sensor size: Medium Format (vs APS-C).
- ▲Max video: 8K (vs 4K30).
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Fujifilm - GFX 100 II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor sizeⓘ | APS-C | Medium Formatlead |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 102 MPlead |
| Max ISO | 32000lead | 12800 |
Video
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Fujifilm - GFX 100 II |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 4K30 | 8Klead |
| RAW video | false | truelead |
| Log profileⓘ | false | truelead |
Autofocus
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Fujifilm - GFX 100 II |
|---|---|---|
| AF pointsⓘ | 651lead | 425 |
| Eye AFⓘ | true | true |
| In-body stabilizationⓘ | false | truelead |
Body & Controls
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Fujifilm - GFX 100 II |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 375 glead | 1030 g |
| Weather sealedⓘ | false | truelead |
| Dual card slotsⓘ | false | truelead |