Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Fujifilm - X-T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 375 g | 557 g |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 40 MP |
| AF points | 651 | 425 |
| In-body stabilization | false | true |
| Log profile | false | true |
| Max video | 4K30 | 6K |
Between the EOS R50 and X-T5, the EOS R50 comes out ahead in weight / af points, while the X-T5 wins on megapixels / in-body stabilization. Overall, the EOS R50 scores 65.6 and the X-T5 scores 72 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X-T5 edges ahead on the Mars Score (65.6 vs 72), but the 6.4-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the EOS R50 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, af points. The single most decisive one: Weight — 182.00 g less. 375 vs 557.
Pick the X-T5 if you care most about megapixels / in-body stabilization. Its strongest claims are megapixels, in-body stabilization, log profile, among others. The single most decisive one: Megapixels — 66.67% more. 40 MP vs 24 MP.
Both ship with comparable sensor size, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X-T5 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Canon - EOS R50 or Fujifilm - X-T5?
Fujifilm - X-T5 leads the current Mars Score by 6.4 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare megapixels, max video, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Canon - EOS R50 if…
Canon - EOS R50 has the measurable edge on weight g, af points.
Choose Fujifilm - X-T5 if…
Fujifilm - X-T5 has the measurable edge on megapixels, has ibis, has log profile.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Canon - EOS R50 wins
- ▲Weight — 182.00 g less. 375 vs 557.
- ▲AF points — 53.18% more. 651 vs 425.
Why Fujifilm - X-T5 wins
- ▲Megapixels — 66.67% more. 40 MP vs 24 MP.
- ▲Has In-body stabilization.
- ▲Has Log profile.
- ▲Max video: 6K (vs 4K30).
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Fujifilm - X-T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor sizeⓘ | APS-C | APS-C |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 40 MPlead |
| Max ISO | 32000 | 51200lead |
Video
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Fujifilm - X-T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 4K30 | 6Klead |
| RAW video | false | false |
| Log profileⓘ | false | truelead |
Autofocus
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Fujifilm - X-T5 |
|---|---|---|
| AF pointsⓘ | 651lead | 425 |
| Eye AFⓘ | true | true |
| In-body stabilizationⓘ | false | truelead |
Body & Controls
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Fujifilm - X-T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 375 glead | 557 g |
| Weather sealedⓘ | false | truelead |
| Dual card slotsⓘ | false | truelead |