Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 375 g | 514 g |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 33 MP |
| AF points | 651 | 759 |
| In-body stabilization | false | true |
| Log profile | false | true |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full Frame |
Between the EOS R50 and α7C II, the EOS R50 comes out ahead in weight, while the α7C II wins on megapixels / af points. Overall, the EOS R50 scores 65.6 and the α7C II scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The α7C II edges ahead on the Mars Score (65.6 vs 71.7), but the 6.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the EOS R50 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight. The single most decisive one: Weight — 139.00 g less. 375 vs 514.
Pick the α7C II if you care most about megapixels / af points. Its strongest claims are megapixels, af points, in-body stabilization, among others. The single most decisive one: Megapixels — 37.50% more. 33 MP vs 24 MP.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the α7C II is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Canon - EOS R50 or Sony - α7C II?
Sony - α7C II leads the current Mars Score by 6.1 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare megapixels, sensor size, max video, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Canon - EOS R50 if…
Canon - EOS R50 has the measurable edge on weight g.
Choose Sony - α7C II if…
Sony - α7C II has the measurable edge on megapixels, af points, has ibis.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Canon - EOS R50 wins
- ▲Weight — 139.00 g less. 375 vs 514.
Why Sony - α7C II wins
- ▲Megapixels — 37.50% more. 33 MP vs 24 MP.
- ▲AF points — 16.59% more. 759 vs 651.
- ▲Has In-body stabilization.
- ▲Has Log profile.
- ▲Sensor size: Full Frame (vs APS-C).
- ▲Max video: 4K60 (vs 4K30).
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor sizeⓘ | APS-C | Full Framelead |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 33 MPlead |
| Max ISO | 32000 | 51200lead |
Video
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 4K30 | 4K60lead |
| RAW video | false | false |
| Log profileⓘ | false | truelead |
Autofocus
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| AF pointsⓘ | 651 | 759lead |
| Eye AFⓘ | true | true |
| In-body stabilizationⓘ | false | truelead |
Body & Controls
| Spec | Canon - EOS R50 | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 375 glead | 514 g |
| Weather sealedⓘ | false | truelead |
| Dual card slotsⓘ | false | false |