Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Canon - EOS R6 Mark II | Sony - ZV-E10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 670 g | 377 g |
| AF points | 1053 | 759 |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 26 MP |
| In-body stabilization | true | false |
| Sensor size | Full Frame | APS-C |
Between the EOS R6 Mark II and ZV-E10 II, the EOS R6 Mark II comes out ahead in af points / in-body stabilization, while the ZV-E10 II wins on weight / megapixels. Overall, the EOS R6 Mark II scores 72.1 and the ZV-E10 II scores 69.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (72.1 vs 69.8). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the EOS R6 Mark II if you care most about af points / in-body stabilization. The biggest gaps in its favor are af points, in-body stabilization, sensor size. The single most decisive one: AF points — 38.74% more. 1053 vs 759.
Pick the ZV-E10 II if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight, megapixels. The single most decisive one: Weight — 293.00 g less. 377 vs 670.
Both ship with comparable max video, log profile, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Canon - EOS R6 Mark II or Sony - ZV-E10 II?
Canon - EOS R6 Mark II leads the current Mars Score by 2.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare megapixels, sensor size, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Canon - EOS R6 Mark II if…
Canon - EOS R6 Mark II has the measurable edge on af points, has ibis, sensor size.
Choose Sony - ZV-E10 II if…
Sony - ZV-E10 II has the measurable edge on weight g, megapixels.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Canon - EOS R6 Mark II wins
- ▲AF points — 38.74% more. 1053 vs 759.
- ▲Has In-body stabilization.
- ▲Sensor size: Full Frame (vs APS-C).
Why Sony - ZV-E10 II wins
- ▲Weight — 293.00 g less. 377 vs 670.
- ▲Megapixels — 8.33% more. 26 MP vs 24 MP.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Canon - EOS R6 Mark II | Sony - ZV-E10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor sizeⓘ | Full Framelead | APS-C |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 26 MPlead |
| Max ISO | 102400lead | 32000 |
Video
| Spec | Canon - EOS R6 Mark II | Sony - ZV-E10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 4K60 | 4K60 |
| RAW video | false | false |
| Log profileⓘ | true | true |
Autofocus
| Spec | Canon - EOS R6 Mark II | Sony - ZV-E10 II |
|---|---|---|
| AF pointsⓘ | 1053lead | 759 |
| Eye AFⓘ | true | true |
| In-body stabilizationⓘ | truelead | false |
Body & Controls
| Spec | Canon - EOS R6 Mark II | Sony - ZV-E10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 670 g | 377 glead |
| Weather sealedⓘ | truelead | false |
| Dual card slotsⓘ | truelead | false |