vsMars
Triple duel · Face à face

ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B vs Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)

Dernière mise à jour 1 juin 2026
ROG Swift PG39WCDMASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
ROG Swift PG39WCDM
79.8/ 100A
Open profile →
UltraGear 45GX950A-BLGRENDER
Probe B
LG
UltraGear 45GX950A-B
83.8/ 100A
Open profile →
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe C
Samsung
Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
89.0/ 100S
Open profile →
Verdict rapide

Across ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM, LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B, and Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), the Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) takes the highest Mars Score (89.0), followed by LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B (83.8) and ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM (79.8). See the full readout below.

Pick the Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) if you want the highest-scoring choice on raw spec strength. The 5.2-point gap to the runner-up is wide — the chart-topper is the safer default.

Pick the LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B when you want the spec advantages it carries over the leader (look at the per-product breakdown below).

Pick the ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM if its specific spec advantages line up; the score gap to the runner-up is small enough that this is a legitimate value play.

ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM
Performance84· 45%
Panel75· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B
Performance81· 45%
Panel87· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Performance84· 45%
Panel95· 40%
Connectivity—· 15%
Fiche complète

Spec comparison

Panel

SpecROG Swift PG39WCDMUltraGear 45GX950A-BOdyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Screen sizeⓘ39 "45 "49 "
Panel typeⓘQD-OLEDOLEDQD-OLED
Resolutionⓘ1440p5K5K
Aspect ratioⓘ21:921:932:9
Curvedⓘtruetruetrue

Performance

SpecROG Swift PG39WCDMUltraGear 45GX950A-BOdyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Refresh rateⓘ240 Hz165 Hz240 Hz
Response time (GtG)ⓘ0.03 ms0.03 ms0.03 ms
Peak brightnessⓘ1300 nits1300 nits1000 nits
DCI-P3 coverageⓘ99 %98.5 %99 %
HDRⓘtruetruetrue
G-Syncⓘtruetruefalse
FreeSyncⓘtruetruetrue

Connectivity

SpecROG Swift PG39WCDMUltraGear 45GX950A-BOdyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
HDMI ports221
DisplayPort ports111
USB-C inputtruetruetrue
USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ90 W90 W65 W
KVMtruetruetrue
En détail

Analyses par paire

Comparaison à 2
ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B
Open →
Comparaison à 2
ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM vs Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Open →
Comparaison à 2
LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B vs Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC)
Open →
Questions des lecteurs

Questions fréquentes

Lequel obtient le meilleur score global : ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM, LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B ou Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) ?+

Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) obtient le meilleur score avec 89.0, suivi de LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B (83.8) et ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM (79.8).

Lequel est le plus récent entre ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM, LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B et Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) ?+

LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B est le plus récent, sorti le 2025-04-22.

Lequel a le taux de rafraîchissement le plus élevé : Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) ou LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B ?+

Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) se rafraîchit à 240Hz contre 165Hz.

Lequel a le temps de réponse le plus rapide : Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) ou LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B ?+

LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B répond en 0.03ms contre 0.03ms.

Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC) ou LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B ont-ils l'USB-C avec Power Delivery ?+

Les deux proposent l'USB-C PD — 65W sur Samsung - Odyssey OLED G9 (G93SC), 90W sur LG - UltraGear 45GX950A-B.

Détail spec

Une spec à la fois

Screen size→Panel type→Resolution→Refresh rate→Response time (GtG)→DCI-P3 coverage→

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.