Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Vivo - X200 Pro vs Xiaomi 16 Ultra

Last updated · How Mars Score works
X200 ProVIVORENDER
Probe A
Vivo
X200 Pro
74.0/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery74· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Xiaomi 16 UltraXIAOMIRENDER
Probe B
Xiaomi
Xiaomi 16 Ultra
74.3/ 100B
Performance81· 25%
Battery74· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the X200 Pro and Xiaomi 16 Ultra, the X200 Pro comes out ahead in weight and screen size, while the Xiaomi 16 Ultra wins on wireless charging and pixel density. Overall, the X200 Pro scores 74 and the Xiaomi 16 Ultra scores 74.3 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (74 vs 74.3). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the X200 Pro if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, screen size, water resistance.

Pick the Xiaomi 16 Ultra if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are wireless charging, pixel density, wired charging, among others.

Both ship with comparable battery capacity, ram, main camera, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Vivo - X200 Pro wins

  • Weight — 6.00 g less. 223 vs 229.
  • Screen size — 0.74% more. 6.78 " vs 6.73 ".
  • Water resistance: IP69 (vs IP68).

Why Xiaomi 16 Ultra wins

  • Wireless charging — 166.67% more. 80 W vs 30 W.
  • Pixel density — 15.49% more. 522 ppi vs 452 ppi.
  • Wired charging — 11.11% more. 100 W vs 90 W.
  • AnTuTu — 7.66% more. 2950000 vs 2740000.
  • Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecVivo - X200 ProXiaomi 16 Ultra
Weight223 glead229 g
Thickness8.5 mmlead9.2 mm
Water resistanceIP69leadIP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecVivo - X200 ProXiaomi 16 Ultra
Screen size6.78 "lead6.73 "
Pixel density452 ppi522 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4500 nitslead3200 nits

Performance

SpecVivo - X200 ProXiaomi 16 Ultra
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage512 GB512 GB
AnTuTu27400002950000lead
CPU total clock23.2 GHz23.4 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecVivo - X200 ProXiaomi 16 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera32 MP32 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecVivo - X200 ProXiaomi 16 Ultra
Battery capacity6000 mAh6000 mAh
Wired charging90 W100 Wlead
Wireless charging30 W80 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecVivo - X200 ProXiaomi 16 Ultra
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecVivo - X200 ProXiaomi 16 Ultra
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates4 years5 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, X200 Pro or Xiaomi 16 Ultra?+

Xiaomi 16 Ultra has 0.0% more battery — 6000 mAh vs 6000 mAh.

Which is lighter, X200 Pro or Xiaomi 16 Ultra?+

X200 Pro is 6g lighter — 223g vs 229g.

Is X200 Pro waterproof?+

X200 Pro has an IP69 rating.

Does Xiaomi 16 Ultra support 5G?+

Yes, Xiaomi 16 Ultra supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, X200 Pro or Xiaomi 16 Ultra?+

Xiaomi 16 Ultra has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.