Samsung - Galaxy A36 vs Motorola - Moto G Power 5G (2025)

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (63 vs 61.1). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Galaxy A36 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are wired charging, antutu, weight, among others. The single most decisive one: Wired charging — 50.00% more. 45 W vs 30 W.

Pick the Moto G Power 5G (2025) if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are front camera, pixel density, screen size, among others. The single most decisive one: Front camera — 33.33% more. 16 MP vs 12 MP.

Both ship with comparable battery capacity, ram, main camera, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.