Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Galaxy Z Fold 7SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy Z Fold 7
69.5/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery55· 20%
Display78· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X Fold 3 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X Fold 3 Pro
73.1/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery71· 20%
Display78· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and X Fold 3 Pro, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 comes out ahead in weight / promised os updates, while the X Fold 3 Pro wins on wired charging / wireless charging. Overall, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 scores 69.5 and the X Fold 3 Pro scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The X Fold 3 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (69.5 vs 73.1), but the 3.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Galaxy Z Fold 7 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, promised os updates.

Pick the X Fold 3 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are wired charging, wireless charging, front camera, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, refresh rate, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Samsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7 wins

  • Weight — 21.00 g less. 215 vs 236.
  • Promised OS updates: 7 (vs 4).

Why Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro wins

  • Wired charging — 300.00% more. 100 W vs 25 W.
  • Wireless charging — 233.33% more. 50 W vs 15 W.
  • Front camera — 220.00% more. 32 MP vs 10 MP.
  • Battery capacity — 29.55% more. 5700 mAh vs 4400 mAh.
  • Pixel density — 7.49% more. 402 ppi vs 374 ppi.
  • Screen size — 5.66% more. 8.03 " vs 7.6 ".
  • AnTuTu — 0.98% more. 2070000 vs 2050000.
  • Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP68).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Weight215 glead236 g
Thickness10.6 mmlead11.2 mm
Water resistanceIP68IPX8lead
Form factorfoldable_bookfoldable_book

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Screen size7.6 "8.03 "lead
Pixel density374 ppi402 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2600 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage512 GB512 GB
AnTuTu20500002070000lead
CPU total clock21.4 GHz21.4 GHz

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera10 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
Battery capacity4400 mAh5700 mAhlead
Wired charging25 W100 Wlead
Wireless charging15 W50 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates7 yearslead4 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Galaxy Z Fold 7 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

X Fold 3 Pro has 29.5% more battery — 4400 mAh vs 5700 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy Z Fold 7 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

Galaxy Z Fold 7 is 21g lighter — 215g vs 236g.

Is Galaxy Z Fold 7 waterproof?+

Galaxy Z Fold 7 has an IP68 rating.

Does X Fold 3 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X Fold 3 Pro supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy Z Fold 7 or X Fold 3 Pro?+

X Fold 3 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.