G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB vs Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB | Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | 6000 MT/s | 6400 MT/s |
| CAS latency | 30 | 32 |
Between the Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB and Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB, the Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB comes out ahead in cas latency, while the Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB wins on speed. Overall, the Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB scores 77.8 and the Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB scores 79 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (77.8 vs 79). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB if you care most about cas latency. The biggest gaps in its favor are cas latency. The single most decisive one: CAS latency — 2.00 less. 30 vs 32.
Pick the Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB if you care most about speed. Its strongest claims are speed. The single most decisive one: Speed — 6.67% more. 6400 MT/s vs 6000 MT/s.
Both ship with comparable capacity, generation, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB or Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB?
Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB leads the current Mars Score by 1.2 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare speed, cas latency against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB if…
G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB has the measurable edge on cl latency.
Choose Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB if…
Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB has the measurable edge on speed mts.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB wins
- ▲CAS latency — 2.00 less. 30 vs 32.
Why Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB wins
- ▲Speed — 6.67% more. 6400 MT/s vs 6000 MT/s.
Spec comparison
Spec
| Spec | G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB | Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Speed | 6000 MT/s | 6400 MT/slead |
| CAS latency | 30lead | 32 |
Extras
| Spec | G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB | Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB |
|---|---|---|
| RGB | false | truelead |
| Heatspreader | true | true |
| ECC | false | false |