G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB vs Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB
Between the Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB and Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB, the Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB comes out ahead in cas latency, while the Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB wins on speed. Overall, the Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB scores 68.8 and the Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB scores 70.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (68.8 vs 70.5). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB if you care most about cas latency. The biggest gaps in its favor are cas latency.
Pick the Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB if you care most about speed. Its strongest claims are speed.
Both ship with comparable capacity, generation, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB wins
- ▲CAS latency — 2.00 less. 30 vs 32.
Why Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB wins
- ▲Speed — 6.67% more. 6400 MT/s vs 6000 MT/s.
Spec comparison
Spec
| Spec | G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB | Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Speed | 6000 MT/s | 6400 MT/slead |
| CAS latency | 30lead | 32 |
Extras
| Spec | G.Skill - Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 32GB | Adata - Lancer RGB DDR5-6400 32GB |
|---|---|---|
| RGB | false | truelead |
| Heatspreader | true | true |
| ECC | false | false |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.