Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Insta360 - Ace Pro 2 | Sony - HDR-AS300 |
|---|---|---|
| Waterproof depth | 12 m | 60 m |
| Max 4K fps | 120 | 60 |
| Horizon lock | true | false |
| Max video | 8K | 4K60 |
| Stabilization | gimbal-class | advanced |
Between the Ace Pro 2 and HDR-AS300, the Ace Pro 2 comes out ahead in max 4k fps / horizon lock, while the HDR-AS300 wins on waterproof depth. Overall, the Ace Pro 2 scores 85.5 and the HDR-AS300 scores 65 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Ace Pro 2 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 20.5 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Ace Pro 2 if you care most about max 4k fps / horizon lock. The biggest gaps in its favor are max 4k fps, horizon lock, max video, among others. The single most decisive one: Max 4K fps — 100.00% more. 120 vs 60.
Pick the HDR-AS300 if you care most about waterproof depth. Its strongest claims are waterproof depth. The single most decisive one: Waterproof depth — 400.00% more. 60 m vs 12 m.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the Ace Pro 2 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Insta360 - Ace Pro 2 or Sony - HDR-AS300?
Insta360 - Ace Pro 2 leads the current Mars Score by 20.5 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare max video, max 4k fps, waterproof depth against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Insta360 - Ace Pro 2 if…
Insta360 - Ace Pro 2 has the measurable edge on max fps 4k, has horizon lock, max video.
Choose Sony - HDR-AS300 if…
Sony - HDR-AS300 has the measurable edge on water depth m.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Insta360 - Ace Pro 2 wins
- ▲Max 4K fps — 100.00% more. 120 vs 60.
- ▲Has Horizon lock.
- ▲Max video: 8K (vs 4K60).
- ▲Stabilization: gimbal-class (vs advanced).
Why Sony - HDR-AS300 wins
- ▲Waterproof depth — 400.00% more. 60 m vs 12 m.
Spec comparison
Video
| Spec | Insta360 - Ace Pro 2 | Sony - HDR-AS300 |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 8Klead | 4K60 |
| Max 4K fps | 120lead | 60 |
| HDRⓘ | truelead | false |
| Log profileⓘ | truelead | false |
Stabilization
| Spec | Insta360 - Ace Pro 2 | Sony - HDR-AS300 |
|---|---|---|
| Horizon lock | truelead | false |
| Stabilization | gimbal-classlead | advanced |
Durability
| Spec | Insta360 - Ace Pro 2 | Sony - HDR-AS300 |
|---|---|---|
| Waterproof depth | 12 m | 60 mlead |
| Weight | 180 g | 109 glead |
| Removable lens | truelead | false |