Between the CMF Phone 1 and Phone (3a), the CMF Phone 1 comes out ahead in weight and pixel density, while the Phone (3a) wins on front camera and wired charging. Overall, the CMF Phone 1 scores 61.4 and the Phone (3a) scores 62.5 on our Mars Score.
どちらを買うべき?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (61.4 vs 62.5). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the CMF Phone 1 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density.
Pick the Phone (3a) if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are front camera, wired charging, antutu, among others.
Both ship with comparable battery capacity, ram, main camera, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Nothing - CMF Phone 1が勝つ理由
- ▲Weight — 4.00 g less. 197 vs 201.
- ▲Pixel density — 2.07% more. 395 ppi vs 387 ppi.
Nothing - Phone (3a)が勝つ理由
- ▲Front camera — 100.00% more. 32 MP vs 16 MP.
- ▲Wired charging — 51.52% more. 50 W vs 33 W.
- ▲AnTuTu — 46.43% more. 820000 vs 560000.
- ▲Screen size — 1.50% more. 6.77 " vs 6.67 ".
- ▲Has Optical image stabilization.
- ▲Water resistance: IP64 (vs IP52).
- ▲Promised OS updates: 3 (vs 2).
スペック比較
Design
| スペック | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Nothing - Phone (3a) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 197 glead | 201 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mmlead | 8.4 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP52 | IP64lead |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| スペック | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Nothing - Phone (3a) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.67 " | 6.77 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 395 ppilead | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2000 nits | 3000 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| スペック | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Nothing - Phone (3a) |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | false | truelead |
Battery
| スペック | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Nothing - Phone (3a) |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 33 W | 50 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 0 W | 0 W |
Connectivity
| スペック | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Nothing - Phone (3a) |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | truelead | false |
Operating System
| スペック | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Nothing - Phone (3a) |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 2 years | 3 yearslead |
よくある質問
Which has better battery, CMF Phone 1 or Phone (3a)?+
Phone (3a) has 0.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
Which is lighter, CMF Phone 1 or Phone (3a)?+
CMF Phone 1 is 4g lighter — 197g vs 201g.
Is CMF Phone 1 waterproof?+
CMF Phone 1 has an IP52 rating.
Does Phone (3a) support 5G?+
Yes, Phone (3a) supports 5G.
Which has a better camera, CMF Phone 1 or Phone (3a)?+
Phone (3a) has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
スペック詳細分析
同じブランドの他の製品
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.