Between the CMF Phone 1 and X200, the CMF Phone 1 comes out ahead in weight, while the X200 wins on antutu and wired charging. Overall, the CMF Phone 1 scores 61.4 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 10.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the CMF Phone 1 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight.
Pick the X200 if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are antutu, wired charging, front camera, among others.
Both ship with comparable main camera, screen size, refresh rate, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X200 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Nothing - CMF Phone 1 wins
- ▲Weight — 5.00 g less. 197 vs 202.
Why Vivo - X200 wins
- ▲AnTuTu — 367.86% more. 2620000 vs 560000.
- ▲Wired charging — 172.73% more. 90 W vs 33 W.
- ▲Front camera — 100.00% more. 32 MP vs 16 MP.
- ▲RAM — 50.00% more. 12 GB vs 8 GB.
- ▲Pixel density — 16.46% more. 460 ppi vs 395 ppi.
- ▲Battery capacity — 16.00% more. 5800 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
- ▲Has Optical image stabilization.
- ▲Water resistance: IP68 (vs IP52).
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 197 glead | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.0 mmlead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP52 | IP68lead |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.67 " | 6.67 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 395 ppi | 460 ppilead |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | false | truelead |
Battery
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | 5800 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 33 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 0 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | truelead | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 2 years | 4 yearslead |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, CMF Phone 1 or X200?+
X200 has 16.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5800 mAh.
Which is lighter, CMF Phone 1 or X200?+
CMF Phone 1 is 5g lighter — 197g vs 202g.
Is CMF Phone 1 waterproof?+
CMF Phone 1 has an IP52 rating.
Does X200 support 5G?+
Yes, X200 supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, CMF Phone 1 or X200?+
X200 offers 12GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, CMF Phone 1 or X200?+
X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.