Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Nothing - Phone (3)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Galaxy Z Fold 7SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy Z Fold 7
69.5/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery55· 20%
Display78· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Phone (3)NOTHINGRENDER
Probe B
Nothing
Phone (3)
68.7/ 100B
Performance71· 25%
Battery64· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Phone (3), the Galaxy Z Fold 7 comes out ahead in ram and screen size, while the Phone (3) wins on front camera and wired charging. Overall, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 scores 69.5 and the Phone (3) scores 68.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (69.5 vs 68.7). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Galaxy Z Fold 7 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are ram, screen size, promised os updates.

Pick the Phone (3) if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are front camera, wired charging, pixel density, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Samsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7 wins

  • RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
  • Screen size — 13.43% more. 7.6 " vs 6.7 ".
  • Promised OS updates: 7 (vs 5).

Why Nothing - Phone (3) wins

  • Front camera — 220.00% more. 32 MP vs 10 MP.
  • Wired charging — 160.00% more. 65 W vs 25 W.
  • Pixel density — 22.99% more. 460 ppi vs 374 ppi.
  • Weight — 19.00 g less. 196 vs 215.
  • Battery capacity — 17.05% more. 5150 mAh vs 4400 mAh.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Nothing - Phone (3)
Weight215 g196 glead
Thickness10.6 mm8.4 mmlead
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorfoldable_bookleadbar

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Nothing - Phone (3)
Screen size7.6 "lead6.7 "
Pixel density374 ppi460 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2600 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Nothing - Phone (3)
RAM16 GBlead12 GB
Storage512 GBlead256 GB
AnTuTu20500002050000
CPU total clock21.4 GHz21.6 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Nothing - Phone (3)
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera10 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Nothing - Phone (3)
Battery capacity4400 mAh5150 mAhlead
Wired charging25 W65 Wlead
Wireless charging15 W15 W

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Nothing - Phone (3)
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy Z Fold 7Nothing - Phone (3)
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates7 yearslead5 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Galaxy Z Fold 7 or Phone (3)?+

Phone (3) has 17.0% more battery — 4400 mAh vs 5150 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy Z Fold 7 or Phone (3)?+

Phone (3) is 19g lighter — 215g vs 196g.

Is Galaxy Z Fold 7 waterproof?+

Galaxy Z Fold 7 has an IP68 rating.

Does Phone (3) support 5G?+

Yes, Phone (3) supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Galaxy Z Fold 7 or Phone (3)?+

Galaxy Z Fold 7 offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy Z Fold 7 or Phone (3)?+

Phone (3) has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.