Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Apple - iPhone 16 Pro vs Nothing - Phone (3a)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
iPhone 16 ProAPPLERENDER
Probe A
Apple
iPhone 16 Pro
60.6/ 100C
Performance62· 25%
Battery45· 20%
Display66· 18%
Cameras69· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Phone (3a)NOTHINGRENDER
Probe B
Nothing
Phone (3a)
62.5/ 100C
Performance51· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the iPhone 16 Pro and Phone (3a), the iPhone 16 Pro comes out ahead in antutu and pixel density, while the Phone (3a) wins on front camera and wired charging. Overall, the iPhone 16 Pro scores 60.6 and the Phone (3a) scores 62.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (60.6 vs 62.5). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the iPhone 16 Pro if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are antutu, pixel density, weight, among others.

Pick the Phone (3a) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are front camera, wired charging, battery capacity, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Apple - iPhone 16 Pro wins

  • AnTuTu — 113.41% more. 1750000 vs 820000.
  • Pixel density — 18.86% more. 460 ppi vs 387 ppi.
  • Weight — 2.00 g less. 199 vs 201.
  • Water resistance: IP68 (vs IP64).
  • Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 3).
  • Wireless charging: 25 W vs 0 W.

Why Nothing - Phone (3a) wins

  • Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Wired charging — 85.19% more. 50 W vs 27 W.
  • Battery capacity — 39.59% more. 5000 mAh vs 3582 mAh.
  • Screen size — 7.46% more. 6.77 " vs 6.3 ".
  • Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProNothing - Phone (3a)
Weight199 glead201 g
Thickness8.25 mmlead8.4 mm
Water resistanceIP68leadIP64
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProNothing - Phone (3a)
Screen size6.3 "6.77 "lead
Pixel density460 ppilead387 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2000 nits3000 nitslead

Performance

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProNothing - Phone (3a)
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage256 GBlead128 GB
AnTuTu1750000lead820000
CPU total clock17.8 GHzlead10.8 GHz

Cameras

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProNothing - Phone (3a)
Main camera48 MP50 MPlead
Front camera12 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProNothing - Phone (3a)
Battery capacity3582 mAh5000 mAhlead
Wired charging27 W50 Wlead
Wireless charging25 Wlead0 W

Connectivity

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProNothing - Phone (3a)
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProNothing - Phone (3a)
OSiOSleadAndroid
Promised OS updates5 yearslead3 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, iPhone 16 Pro or Phone (3a)?+

Phone (3a) has 39.6% more battery — 3582 mAh vs 5000 mAh.

Which is lighter, iPhone 16 Pro or Phone (3a)?+

iPhone 16 Pro is 2g lighter — 199g vs 201g.

Is iPhone 16 Pro waterproof?+

iPhone 16 Pro has an IP68 rating.

Does Phone (3a) support 5G?+

Yes, Phone (3a) supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, iPhone 16 Pro or Phone (3a)?+

Phone (3a) has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.