Between the iPhone 16e and X Fold 3 Pro, the iPhone 16e comes out ahead in weight and pixel density, while the X Fold 3 Pro wins on wired charging and front camera. Overall, the iPhone 16e scores 58.6 and the X Fold 3 Pro scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.
どちらを買うべき?
The X Fold 3 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 14.5 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the iPhone 16e if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density, promised os updates.
Pick the X Fold 3 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are wired charging, front camera, ram, among others.
Both ship with comparable 5g support, optical image stabilization, headphone jack, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X Fold 3 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Apple - iPhone 16eが勝つ理由
- ▲Weight — 69.00 g less. 167 vs 236.
- ▲Pixel density — 14.43% more. 460 ppi vs 402 ppi.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).
Vivo - X Fold 3 Proが勝つ理由
- ▲Wired charging — 400.00% more. 100 W vs 20 W.
- ▲Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
- ▲RAM — 100.00% more. 16 GB vs 8 GB.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 120 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Battery capacity — 42.32% more. 5700 mAh vs 4005 mAh.
- ▲Screen size — 31.64% more. 8.03 " vs 6.1 ".
- ▲AnTuTu — 31.01% more. 2070000 vs 1580000.
- ▲Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
スペック比較
Design
| スペック | Apple - iPhone 16e | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 167 glead | 236 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mmlead | 11.2 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IPX8lead |
| Form factor | bar | foldable_booklead |
Display
| スペック | Apple - iPhone 16e | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.1 " | 8.03 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 460 ppilead | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 60 Hz | 120 Hzlead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1200 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| スペック | Apple - iPhone 16e | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 48 MP | 50 MPlead |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| スペック | Apple - iPhone 16e | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4005 mAh | 5700 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 20 W | 100 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 0 W | 50 Wlead |
Connectivity
| スペック | Apple - iPhone 16e | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| スペック | Apple - iPhone 16e | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | iOSlead | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 5 yearslead | 4 years |
よくある質問
Which has better battery, iPhone 16e or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro has 42.3% more battery — 4005 mAh vs 5700 mAh.
Which is lighter, iPhone 16e or X Fold 3 Pro?+
iPhone 16e is 69g lighter — 167g vs 236g.
Is iPhone 16e waterproof?+
iPhone 16e has an IP68 rating.
Does X Fold 3 Pro support 5G?+
Yes, X Fold 3 Pro supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, iPhone 16e or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, iPhone 16e or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.
スペック詳細分析
同じブランドの他の製品
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.