Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Apple - iPhone 17 vs Vivo - X200 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
iPhone 17APPLERENDER
Probe A
Apple
iPhone 17
61.7/ 100C
Performance65· 25%
Battery46· 20%
Display66· 18%
Cameras69· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200 Pro
74.0/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery74· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the iPhone 17 and X200 Pro, the iPhone 17 comes out ahead in weight and pixel density, while the X200 Pro wins on wired charging and front camera. Overall, the iPhone 17 scores 61.7 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The X200 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the iPhone 17 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density, promised os updates.

Pick the X200 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are wired charging, front camera, ram, among others.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, 5g support, optical image stabilization, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the X200 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Apple - iPhone 17 wins

  • Weight — 29.00 g less. 194 vs 223.
  • Pixel density — 1.77% more. 460 ppi vs 452 ppi.
  • Promised OS updates: 6 (vs 4).

Why Vivo - X200 Pro wins

  • Wired charging — 233.33% more. 90 W vs 27 W.
  • Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
  • RAM — 100.00% more. 16 GB vs 8 GB.
  • Battery capacity — 62.51% more. 6000 mAh vs 3692 mAh.
  • AnTuTu — 38.38% more. 2740000 vs 1980000.
  • Wireless charging — 20.00% more. 30 W vs 25 W.
  • Screen size — 7.62% more. 6.78 " vs 6.3 ".
  • Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecApple - iPhone 17Vivo - X200 Pro
Weight194 glead223 g
Thickness8.1 mmlead8.5 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP69lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecApple - iPhone 17Vivo - X200 Pro
Screen size6.3 "6.78 "lead
Pixel density460 ppilead452 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2200 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecApple - iPhone 17Vivo - X200 Pro
RAM8 GB16 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu19800002740000lead
CPU total clock19.2 GHz23.2 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecApple - iPhone 17Vivo - X200 Pro
Main camera48 MP50 MPlead
Front camera12 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecApple - iPhone 17Vivo - X200 Pro
Battery capacity3692 mAh6000 mAhlead
Wired charging27 W90 Wlead
Wireless charging25 W30 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecApple - iPhone 17Vivo - X200 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecApple - iPhone 17Vivo - X200 Pro
OSiOSleadAndroid
Promised OS updates6 yearslead4 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, iPhone 17 or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has 62.5% more battery — 3692 mAh vs 6000 mAh.

Which is lighter, iPhone 17 or X200 Pro?+

iPhone 17 is 29g lighter — 194g vs 223g.

Is iPhone 17 waterproof?+

iPhone 17 has an IP68 rating.

Does X200 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, iPhone 17 or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, iPhone 17 or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.