Between the Razr 50 and Phone (3), the Razr 50 comes out ahead in weight and screen size, while the Phone (3) wins on antutu and wired charging. Overall, the Razr 50 scores 60.2 and the Phone (3) scores 68.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Phone (3) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.5 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Razr 50 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, screen size, water resistance.
Pick the Phone (3) if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are antutu, wired charging, ram, among others.
Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Phone (3) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Motorola - Razr 50 wins
- ▲Weight — 8.00 g less. 188 vs 196.
- ▲Screen size — 2.99% more. 6.9 " vs 6.7 ".
- ▲Water resistance: IPX8 (vs IP68).
Why Nothing - Phone (3) wins
- ▲AnTuTu — 162.82% more. 2050000 vs 780000.
- ▲Wired charging — 160.00% more. 65 W vs 25 W.
- ▲RAM — 50.00% more. 12 GB vs 8 GB.
- ▲Battery capacity — 22.62% more. 5150 mAh vs 4200 mAh.
- ▲Pixel density — 11.38% more. 460 ppi vs 413 ppi.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 3).
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Nothing - Phone (3) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 glead | 196 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mmlead | 8.4 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IPX8lead | IP68 |
| Form factor | foldable_clamshelllead | bar |
Display
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Nothing - Phone (3) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.9 "lead | 6.7 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 413 ppi | 460 ppilead |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 3000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Nothing - Phone (3) |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Nothing - Phone (3) |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 4200 mAh | 5150 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 25 W | 65 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 15 W | 15 W |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Nothing - Phone (3) |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Motorola - Razr 50 | Nothing - Phone (3) |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 3 years | 5 yearslead |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, Razr 50 or Phone (3)?+
Phone (3) has 22.6% more battery — 4200 mAh vs 5150 mAh.
Which is lighter, Razr 50 or Phone (3)?+
Razr 50 is 8g lighter — 188g vs 196g.
Is Razr 50 waterproof?+
Razr 50 has an IPX8 rating.
Does Phone (3) support 5G?+
Yes, Phone (3) supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, Razr 50 or Phone (3)?+
Phone (3) offers 12GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, Razr 50 or Phone (3)?+
Phone (3) has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.