Between the Phone (3a) Pro and X200, the Phone (3a) Pro comes out ahead in front camera and screen size, while the X200 wins on antutu and wired charging. Overall, the Phone (3a) Pro scores 63.8 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 edges ahead on the Mars Score (63.8 vs 71.7), but the 7.9-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Phone (3a) Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. The biggest gaps in its favor are front camera, screen size.
Pick the X200 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are antutu, wired charging, pixel density, among others.
Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, refresh rate, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X200 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro wins
- ▲Front camera — 56.25% more. 50 MP vs 32 MP.
- ▲Screen size — 1.50% more. 6.77 " vs 6.67 ".
Why Vivo - X200 wins
- ▲AnTuTu — 208.24% more. 2620000 vs 850000.
- ▲Wired charging — 80.00% more. 90 W vs 50 W.
- ▲Pixel density — 18.86% more. 460 ppi vs 387 ppi.
- ▲Battery capacity — 16.00% more. 5800 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
- ▲Weight — 9.00 g less. 202 vs 211.
- ▲Water resistance: IP68 (vs IP64).
- ▲Promised OS updates: 4 (vs 3).
- ▲Wireless charging: 30 W vs 0 W.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 211 g | 202 glead |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.0 mmlead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP64 | IP68lead |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.77 "lead | 6.67 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 387 ppi | 460 ppilead |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 3000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 50 MPlead | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | 5800 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 50 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 0 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 3 years | 4 yearslead |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, Phone (3a) Pro or X200?+
X200 has 16.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5800 mAh.
Which is lighter, Phone (3a) Pro or X200?+
X200 is 9g lighter — 211g vs 202g.
Is Phone (3a) Pro waterproof?+
Phone (3a) Pro has an IP64 rating.
Does X200 support 5G?+
Yes, X200 supports 5G.
Which has a better camera, Phone (3a) Pro or X200?+
X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.