Between the Reno 13 Pro and X200, the Reno 13 Pro comes out ahead in front camera and weight, while the X200 wins on antutu and wired charging. Overall, the Reno 13 Pro scores 68.3 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 edges ahead on the Mars Score (68.3 vs 71.7), but the 3.4-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Reno 13 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. The biggest gaps in its favor are front camera, weight, screen size.
Pick the X200 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are antutu, wired charging, pixel density, among others.
Both ship with comparable battery capacity, ram, main camera, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Oppo - Reno 13 Pro wins
- ▲Front camera — 56.25% more. 50 MP vs 32 MP.
- ▲Weight — 7.00 g less. 195 vs 202.
- ▲Screen size — 2.40% more. 6.83 " vs 6.67 ".
Why Vivo - X200 wins
- ▲AnTuTu — 83.22% more. 2620000 vs 1430000.
- ▲Wired charging — 12.50% more. 90 W vs 80 W.
- ▲Pixel density — 1.55% more. 460 ppi vs 453 ppi.
- ▲Wireless charging: 30 W vs 0 W.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Oppo - Reno 13 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 glead | 202 g |
| Thickness | 7.55 mmlead | 8.0 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IP68 |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Oppo - Reno 13 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.83 "lead | 6.67 " |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 453 ppi | 460 ppilead |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1200 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Oppo - Reno 13 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 50 MPlead | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Oppo - Reno 13 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5800 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 80 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 0 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Oppo - Reno 13 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Oppo - Reno 13 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 4 years | 4 years |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, Reno 13 Pro or X200?+
X200 has 0.0% more battery — 5800 mAh vs 5800 mAh.
Which is lighter, Reno 13 Pro or X200?+
Reno 13 Pro is 7g lighter — 195g vs 202g.
Is Reno 13 Pro waterproof?+
Reno 13 Pro has an IP68 rating.
Does X200 support 5G?+
Yes, X200 supports 5G.
Which has a better camera, Reno 13 Pro or X200?+
X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.