Skip to content
vsMars
直接対決

Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra vs Vivo - X200 Pro

最終更新 · マーズスコアの仕組み
Poco F7 UltraXIAOMIRENDER
Probe A
Xiaomi
Poco F7 Ultra
70.4/ 100B
Performance75· 25%
Battery66· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200 Pro
74.0/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery74· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
クイック判定

Between the Poco F7 Ultra and X200 Pro, the Poco F7 Ultra comes out ahead in wireless charging and wired charging, while the X200 Pro wins on ram and battery capacity. Overall, the Poco F7 Ultra scores 70.4 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.

購入アドバイス

どちらを買うべき?

The X200 Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 74), but the 3.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Poco F7 Ultra if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are wireless charging, wired charging, weight.

Pick the X200 Pro if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are ram, battery capacity, antutu, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultraが勝つ理由

  • Wireless charging — 66.67% more. 50 W vs 30 W.
  • Wired charging — 33.33% more. 120 W vs 90 W.
  • Weight — 11.00 g less. 212 vs 223.

Vivo - X200 Proが勝つ理由

  • RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
  • Battery capacity — 13.21% more. 6000 mAh vs 5300 mAh.
  • AnTuTu — 3.79% more. 2740000 vs 2640000.
  • Screen size — 1.65% more. 6.78 " vs 6.67 ".
  • Pixel density — 1.35% more. 452 ppi vs 446 ppi.
  • Water resistance: IP69 (vs IP68).
全データ

スペック比較

Design

スペックXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200 Pro
Weight212 glead223 g
Thickness8.4 mmlead8.5 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP69lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

スペックXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200 Pro
Screen size6.67 "6.78 "lead
Pixel density446 ppi452 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3200 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

スペックXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200 Pro
RAM12 GB16 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu26400002740000lead
CPU total clock22.8 GHz23.2 GHzlead

Cameras

スペックXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera32 MP32 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

スペックXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200 Pro
Battery capacity5300 mAh6000 mAhlead
Wired charging120 Wlead90 W
Wireless charging50 Wlead30 W

Connectivity

スペックXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

スペックXiaomi - Poco F7 UltraVivo - X200 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates4 years4 years
読者からの質問

よくある質問

Which has better battery, Poco F7 Ultra or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has 13.2% more battery — 5300 mAh vs 6000 mAh.

Which is lighter, Poco F7 Ultra or X200 Pro?+

Poco F7 Ultra is 11g lighter — 212g vs 223g.

Is Poco F7 Ultra waterproof?+

Poco F7 Ultra has an IP68 rating.

Does X200 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Poco F7 Ultra or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Poco F7 Ultra or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

深掘り

スペック詳細分析

メーカー別

同じブランドの他の製品

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.