Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 | Nothing - Ear (3) |
|---|---|---|
| Battery — with case | 27 h | 40 h |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 11 mm |
| Battery — buds | 8 h | 8.5 h |
| Weight per bud | 5.7 g | 4.6 g |
| Spatial audio | true | false |
| Water resistance | IP57 | IP54 |
Between the Elite 10 Gen 2 and Ear (3), the Elite 10 Gen 2 comes out ahead in spatial audio / water resistance, while the Ear (3) wins on battery — with case / driver size. Overall, the Elite 10 Gen 2 scores 76.5 and the Ear (3) scores 79.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Ear (3) edges ahead on the Mars Score (76.5 vs 79.8), but the 3.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Elite 10 Gen 2 if audio quality and feature breadth (ANC, codecs, multipoint) are the lead criteria for your purchase. The biggest gaps in its favor are spatial audio, water resistance. The single most decisive one: Has Spatial audio.
Pick the Ear (3) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are battery — with case, driver size, battery — buds, among others. The single most decisive one: Battery — with case — 48.15% more. 40 h vs 27 h.
Both ship with comparable active noise cancellation, multipoint, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 or Nothing - Ear (3)?
Nothing - Ear (3) leads the current Mars Score by 3.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare driver size, battery — buds, weight per bud against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 if…
Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 has the measurable edge on has spatial audio, ip rating.
Choose Nothing - Ear (3) if…
Nothing - Ear (3) has the measurable edge on battery life case h, driver size mm, battery life buds h.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 wins
- ▲Has Spatial audio.
- ▲Water resistance: IP57 (vs IP54).
Why Nothing - Ear (3) wins
- ▲Battery — with case — 48.15% more. 40 h vs 27 h.
- ▲Driver size — 10.00% more. 11 mm vs 10 mm.
- ▲Battery — buds — 6.25% more. 8.5 h vs 8 h.
- ▲Weight per bud — 1.10 g less. 4.6 vs 5.7.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 | Nothing - Ear (3) |
|---|---|---|
| Form factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Weight per bud | 5.7 g | 4.6 glead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP57lead | IP54 |
Audio
| Spec | Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 | Nothing - Ear (3) |
|---|---|---|
| Driver sizeⓘ | 10 mm | 11 mmlead |
| Active noise cancellationⓘ | true | true |
| Transparency mode | true | true |
| Spatial audioⓘ | truelead | false |
Battery
| Spec | Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 | Nothing - Ear (3) |
|---|---|---|
| Battery — buds | 8 h | 8.5 hlead |
| Battery — with case | 27 h | 40 hlead |
| Wireless case chargingⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | Jabra - Elite 10 Gen 2 | Nothing - Ear (3) |
|---|---|---|
| Bluetoothⓘ | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Codecsⓘ | LE Audio,AAC,SBC | LDAC,LHDC 5.0,AAC,SBC |
| Multipointⓘ | true | true |
| In-ear detection | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has longer battery, Elite 10 Gen 2 or Ear (3)?+
Ear (3) lasts 8.5h per charge vs 8h.
Do Elite 10 Gen 2 or Ear (3) support multipoint?+
Both support multipoint pairing.
Which has ANC, Elite 10 Gen 2 or Ear (3)?+
Both models have active noise cancellation.