Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Nikon - Z f | Sony - ZV-E10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 710 g | 377 g |
| AF points | 299 | 759 |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 26 MP |
| In-body stabilization | true | false |
| Sensor size | Full Frame | APS-C |
Between the Z f and ZV-E10 II, the Z f comes out ahead in in-body stabilization / sensor size, while the ZV-E10 II wins on weight / af points. Overall, the Z f scores 64.3 and the ZV-E10 II scores 69.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The ZV-E10 II edges ahead on the Mars Score (64.3 vs 69.8), but the 5.5-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Z f if you care most about in-body stabilization / sensor size. The biggest gaps in its favor are in-body stabilization, sensor size. The single most decisive one: Has In-body stabilization.
Pick the ZV-E10 II if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight, af points, megapixels. The single most decisive one: Weight — 333.00 g less. 377 vs 710.
Both ship with comparable max video, log profile, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the ZV-E10 II is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Nikon - Z f or Sony - ZV-E10 II?
Sony - ZV-E10 II leads the current Mars Score by 5.5 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare megapixels, sensor size, weight against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Nikon - Z f if…
Nikon - Z f has the measurable edge on has ibis, sensor size.
Choose Sony - ZV-E10 II if…
Sony - ZV-E10 II has the measurable edge on weight g, af points, megapixels.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Nikon - Z f wins
- ▲Has In-body stabilization.
- ▲Sensor size: Full Frame (vs APS-C).
Why Sony - ZV-E10 II wins
- ▲Weight — 333.00 g less. 377 vs 710.
- ▲AF points — 153.85% more. 759 vs 299.
- ▲Megapixels — 8.33% more. 26 MP vs 24 MP.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Nikon - Z f | Sony - ZV-E10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor sizeⓘ | Full Framelead | APS-C |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 26 MPlead |
| Max ISO | 64000lead | 32000 |
Video
| Spec | Nikon - Z f | Sony - ZV-E10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 4K60 | 4K60 |
| RAW video | false | false |
| Log profileⓘ | true | true |
Autofocus
| Spec | Nikon - Z f | Sony - ZV-E10 II |
|---|---|---|
| AF pointsⓘ | 299 | 759lead |
| Eye AFⓘ | true | true |
| In-body stabilizationⓘ | truelead | false |
Body & Controls
| Spec | Nikon - Z f | Sony - ZV-E10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 710 g | 377 glead |
| Weather sealedⓘ | truelead | false |
| Dual card slotsⓘ | false | false |