Nothing - Phone (3) vs Xiaomi - Poco F7 Ultra

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (68.9 vs 69.2). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Phone (3) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density, promised os updates, among others. The single most decisive one: Weight — 16.00 g less. 196 vs 212.

Pick the Poco F7 Ultra if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are wireless charging, wired charging, antutu, among others. The single most decisive one: Wireless charging — 233.33% more. 50 W vs 15 W.

Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, refresh rate, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.