OM System - OM-1 Mark II vs Sony - ZV-E10 II

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (67.4 vs 69.8). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the OM-1 Mark II if you care most about af points / in-body stabilization. The biggest gaps in its favor are af points, in-body stabilization. The single most decisive one: AF points — 38.74% more. 1053 vs 759.

Pick the ZV-E10 II if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight, megapixels, sensor size. The single most decisive one: Weight — 222.00 g less. 377 vs 599.

Both ship with comparable max video, log profile, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.