Who is the Varjo - XR-4 for?
Solid mid-pack vr headset. The 68.3 score lands in B-tier (68-77) — competent across the board with one or two specs holding it back from a higher tier.
Right buy if pricing matters and the trade-offs the formula penalizes don't affect how you use the device. Worth comparing against the A-tier picks in our best vr headsets list.
Mars Score is computed from 10 measured specs against the transparent formula for the vr headsets category. No editorial picks, no paid placement.
Pros and cons at a glance
- ▲Inside-out tracking — supported.
- ▲Field of view: 120 °.
- ▼Refresh rate: 90 Hz (below category average).
Pros are specs scoring ≥75% of the category normalization range. Cons are ≤35%. Derived from the Mars Score formula — no hand-curated lists.
At a glance
- Resolution per eye
- 3840x3744
- Refresh rate
- 90Hz
- Field of view
- 120°
- Standalone
- false
All specifications
Display
- Resolution per eye
- 3840x3744
- Refresh rate?
- 90 Hz
- Field of view
- 120 °
Tracking & Audio
- Inside-out tracking
- true
- Eye tracking
- true
- Face tracking
- false
- Color passthrough
- true
Compute
- Standalone
- false
- Battery
- 0 h
Latest from the lab
All lab reports →Popular comparisons featuring the Varjo - XR-4
Top 8 closest matchups in the VR Headsets category. Sorted by Mars Score proximity — these are the fights most worth your time.
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.