Between the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) and Quest 3, the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) comes out ahead in eye tracking, while the Quest 3 wins on several specs. Overall, the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) scores 72.9 and the Quest 3 scores 72.9 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are evenly matched on the broad strokes, with the decision sitting on which individual spec advantages weigh more for your use.
Pick the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) if you care most about eye tracking. The biggest gaps in its favor are eye tracking.
The Quest 3 similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, field of view, standalone, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) wins
- ▲Has Eye tracking.
Why Meta - Quest 3 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) | Meta - Quest 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution per eye | 4160x3840 | 2064x2208 |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Field of view | 110 ° | 110 ° |
| Panelⓘ | Micro-OLEDlead | LCD |
Tracking & Audio
| Spec | Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) | Meta - Quest 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Inside-out tracking | true | true |
| Eye tracking | truelead | false |
| Face tracking | truelead | false |
| Color passthrough | true | true |
Compute
| Spec | Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) | Meta - Quest 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Standalone | true | true |
| Battery | 3.0 hlead | 2.2 h |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.