Between the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) and Quest 3, the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) comes out ahead in eye tracking, while the Quest 3 wins on several specs. Overall, the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) scores 72.9 and the Quest 3 scores 72.9 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are evenly matched on the broad strokes; the decision sits on which individual spec advantages weigh more for your use.
Pick the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) if you care most about eye tracking. The biggest gaps in its favor are eye tracking.
The Quest 3 similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, field of view, standalone, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) wins
- ▲Has Eye tracking.
Why Meta - Quest 3 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) | Meta - Quest 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution per eye | 4160x3840 | 2064x2208 |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Field of view | 110 ° | 110 ° |
| Panelⓘ | Micro-OLEDlead | LCD |
Tracking & Audio
| Spec | Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) | Meta - Quest 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Inside-out tracking | true | true |
| Eye tracking | truelead | false |
| Face tracking | truelead | false |
| Color passthrough | true | true |
Compute
| Spec | Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) | Meta - Quest 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Standalone | true | true |
| Battery | 3.0 hlead | 2.2 h |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.