Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) vs Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
Between the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) and Galaxy XR (Project Moohan), the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) comes out ahead in refresh rate, while the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins on several specs. Overall, the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) scores 80 and the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) scores 72.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Vision Pro 2 (rumored) edges ahead on the Mars Score (80 vs 72.2), but the 7.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate. The single most decisive one: Refresh rate — 33.33% more. 120 Hz vs 90 Hz.
The Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) similarly does not carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable field of view, standalone, eye tracking, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Vision Pro 2 (rumored) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) or Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)?
Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) leads the current Mars Score by 7.8 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare refresh rate against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) if…
Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) has the measurable edge on refresh rate hz.
Choose Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) if…
Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 33.33% more. 120 Hz vs 90 Hz.
Why Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution per eye | 4160x3840 | 3552x3840 |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hzlead | 90 Hz |
| Field of view | 110 ° | 110 ° |
| Panelⓘ | Micro-OLED | Micro-OLED |
Tracking & Audio
| Spec | Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Inside-out tracking | true | true |
| Eye tracking | true | true |
| Face tracking | true | true |
| Color passthrough | true | true |
Compute
| Spec | Apple - Vision Pro 2 (rumored) | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Standalone | true | true |
| Battery | 3.0 hlead | 2.5 h |