Sony - Bravia 8 II OLED 65 vs Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Sony - Bravia 8 II OLED 65 | Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2100 nits | 2400 nits |
| HDMI 2.1 ports | 2 | 4 |
| Dolby Vision | true | false |
| Panel type | QD-OLED | Mini-LED |
| Smart OS | Google TV | Tizen |
Between the Bravia 8 II OLED 65 and QN90F Neo QLED 65, the Bravia 8 II OLED 65 comes out ahead in dolby vision / panel type, while the QN90F Neo QLED 65 wins on refresh rate / peak brightness. Overall, the Bravia 8 II OLED 65 scores 72.9 and the QN90F Neo QLED 65 scores 70.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (72.9 vs 70.3). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Bravia 8 II OLED 65 if you care most about dolby vision / panel type. The biggest gaps in its favor are dolby vision, panel type, smart os. The single most decisive one: Has Dolby Vision.
Pick the QN90F Neo QLED 65 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are refresh rate, peak brightness, hdmi 2.1 ports. The single most decisive one: Refresh rate — 20.00% more. 144 Hz vs 120 Hz.
Both ship with comparable screen size, vrr, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Sony - Bravia 8 II OLED 65 or Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65?
Sony - Bravia 8 II OLED 65 leads the current Mars Score by 2.6 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare panel type, refresh rate, hdmi 2.1 ports against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Sony - Bravia 8 II OLED 65 if…
Sony - Bravia 8 II OLED 65 has the measurable edge on has dolby vision, panel type, smart os.
Choose Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 if…
Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 has the measurable edge on refresh rate hz, peak brightness nits, hdmi 2 1 count.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Sony - Bravia 8 II OLED 65 wins
- ▲Has Dolby Vision.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs Mini-LED).
- ▲Smart OS: Google TV (vs Tizen).
Why Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 20.00% more. 144 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 14.29% more. 2400 nits vs 2100 nits.
- ▲HDMI 2.1 ports — 2.00 more. 4 vs 2.
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Sony - Bravia 8 II OLED 65 | Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 65 " | 65 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | Mini-LED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 144 Hzlead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2100 nits | 2400 nitslead |
HDR & Smart
| Spec | Sony - Bravia 8 II OLED 65 | Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Dolby Visionⓘ | truelead | false |
| HDR10+ⓘ | false | truelead |
| Smart OS | Google TVlead | Tizen |
| Dolby Atmosⓘ | true | true |
Gaming
| Spec | Sony - Bravia 8 II OLED 65 | Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI 2.1 portsⓘ | 2 | 4lead |
| VRRⓘ | true | true |
| ALLM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which is brighter, Bravia 8 II OLED 65 or QN90F Neo QLED 65?+
QN90F Neo QLED 65 peaks at 2400 nits vs 2100 nits.
Which is better for gaming, Bravia 8 II OLED 65 or QN90F Neo QLED 65?+
QN90F Neo QLED 65 offers 144Hz refresh and 4 HDMI 2.1 ports.
Does Bravia 8 II OLED 65 or QN90F Neo QLED 65 support Dolby Vision?+
Bravia 8 II OLED 65 supports Dolby Vision; QN90F Neo QLED 65 does not.