Sony - Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 vs Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 77
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Sony - Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 77 |
|---|---|---|
| Peak brightness | 2700 nits | 3800 nits |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Screen size | 65 " | 77 " |
| HDMI 2.1 ports | 2 | 4 |
| Dolby Vision | true | false |
| Smart OS | Google TV | Tizen |
Between the Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 and S95F QD-OLED 77, the Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 comes out ahead in dolby vision / smart os, while the S95F QD-OLED 77 wins on peak brightness / refresh rate. Overall, the Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 scores 69.5 and the S95F QD-OLED 77 scores 84.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The S95F QD-OLED 77 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 15.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 if you care most about dolby vision / smart os. The biggest gaps in its favor are dolby vision, smart os. The single most decisive one: Has Dolby Vision.
Pick the S95F QD-OLED 77 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, refresh rate, screen size, among others. The single most decisive one: Peak brightness — 40.74% more. 3800 nits vs 2700 nits.
Both ship with comparable vrr, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the S95F QD-OLED 77 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Sony - Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 or Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 77?
Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 77 leads the current Mars Score by 15.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size, panel type, refresh rate, hdmi 2.1 ports against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Sony - Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 if…
Sony - Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 has the measurable edge on has dolby vision, smart os.
Choose Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 77 if…
Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 77 has the measurable edge on peak brightness nits, refresh rate hz, screen size in.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Sony - Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 wins
- ▲Has Dolby Vision.
- ▲Smart OS: Google TV (vs Tizen).
Why Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 77 wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 40.74% more. 3800 nits vs 2700 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Screen size — 18.46% more. 77 " vs 65 ".
- ▲HDMI 2.1 ports — 2.00 more. 4 vs 2.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs Mini-LED).
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Sony - Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 77 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 65 " | 77 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | Mini-LED | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 165 Hzlead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2700 nits | 3800 nitslead |
HDR & Smart
| Spec | Sony - Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 77 |
|---|---|---|
| Dolby Visionⓘ | truelead | false |
| HDR10+ⓘ | false | truelead |
| Smart OS | Google TVlead | Tizen |
| Dolby Atmosⓘ | true | true |
Gaming
| Spec | Sony - Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 77 |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI 2.1 portsⓘ | 2 | 4lead |
| VRRⓘ | true | true |
| ALLM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which is brighter, Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 or S95F QD-OLED 77?+
S95F QD-OLED 77 peaks at 3800 nits vs 2700 nits.
Which is better for gaming, Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 or S95F QD-OLED 77?+
S95F QD-OLED 77 offers 165Hz refresh and 4 HDMI 2.1 ports.
Does Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 or S95F QD-OLED 77 support Dolby Vision?+
Bravia 9 Mini LED 65 supports Dolby Vision; S95F QD-OLED 77 does not.