Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Canon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM vs Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM

Last updated · How Mars Score works
RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS…CANONILLUSTRATION
Probe A
Canon
RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
74.1/ 100B
Optics81· 55%
Build63· 35%
Mount—· 10%
FE 135mm f/1.8 GMSONYILLUSTRATION
Probe B
Sony
FE 135mm f/1.8 GM
74.3/ 100B
Optics72· 55%
Build77· 35%
Mount—· 10%
The fork

Where they actually differ

The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.

SpecCanon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USMSony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM
Weight1530 g950 g
Optical stabilizationtruefalse
Max focal500 mm135 mm
Min focal100 mm135 mm
Quick verdict

Between the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM and FE 135mm f/1.8 GM, the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM comes out ahead in optical stabilization / max focal, while the FE 135mm f/1.8 GM wins on weight / min focal. Overall, the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM scores 74.1 and the FE 135mm f/1.8 GM scores 74.3 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (74.1 vs 74.3). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM if you care most about optical stabilization / max focal. The biggest gaps in its favor are optical stabilization, max focal. The single most decisive one: Has Optical stabilization.

Pick the FE 135mm f/1.8 GM if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight, min focal. The single most decisive one: Weight — 580.00 g less. 950 vs 1530.

Both ship with comparable weather sealed, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Decision guide

Which should you buy: Canon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM or Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM?

Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM leads the current Mars Score by 0.2 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare min focal, max focal, weight against the way you will actually use the product.

Choose Canon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM if…

Canon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM has the measurable edge on has stabilization, focal max mm.

Choose Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM if…

Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM has the measurable edge on weight g, focal min mm.

This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.

Why Canon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM wins

  • ▲Has Optical stabilization.
  • ▲Max focal: 500 (vs 135).

Why Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM wins

  • ▲Weight — 580.00 g less. 950 vs 1530.
  • ▲Min focal: 135 (vs 100).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Optics

SpecCanon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USMSony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM
Min focal100 mm135 mmlead
Max focal500 mmlead135 mm
Max aperturef/4.5f/1.8
Min aperturef/51f/22

Build

SpecCanon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USMSony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM
Weight1530 g950 glead
Weather sealedⓘtruetrue
Optical stabilizationⓘtrueleadfalse

Mount

SpecCanon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USMSony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM
Lens mountCanon RFleadSony E
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands