Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Canon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM vs Voigtländer - Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE

Last updated · How Mars Score works
RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS…CANONILLUSTRATION
Probe A
Canon
RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM
74.1/ 100B
Optics81· 55%
Build63· 35%
Mount—· 10%
Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SEVOIGTLÄNDERILLUSTRATION
Probe B
Voigtländer
Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE
68.5/ 100B
Optics54· 55%
Build89· 35%
Mount—· 10%
The fork

Where they actually differ

The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.

SpecCanon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USMVoigtländer - Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE
Weight1530 g414 g
Weather sealedtruefalse
Optical stabilizationtruefalse
Min focal100 mm40 mm
Max focal500 mm40 mm
Quick verdict

Between the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM and Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE, the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM comes out ahead in weather sealed / optical stabilization, while the Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE wins on weight. Overall, the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM scores 74.1 and the Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE scores 68.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM edges ahead on the Mars Score (74.1 vs 68.5), but the 5.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM if you care most about weather sealed / optical stabilization. The biggest gaps in its favor are weather sealed, optical stabilization, min focal, among others. The single most decisive one: Has Weather sealed.

Pick the Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight. The single most decisive one: Weight — 1116.00 g less. 414 vs 1530.

There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.

Bottom line: the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Decision guide

Which should you buy: Canon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM or Voigtländer - Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE?

Canon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM leads the current Mars Score by 5.6 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare min focal, max focal, weight against the way you will actually use the product.

Choose Canon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM if…

Canon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM has the measurable edge on weather sealed, has stabilization, focal min mm.

Choose Voigtländer - Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE if…

Voigtländer - Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE has the measurable edge on weight g.

This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.

Why Canon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM wins

  • ▲Has Weather sealed.
  • ▲Has Optical stabilization.
  • ▲Min focal: 100 (vs 40).
  • ▲Max focal: 500 (vs 40).

Why Voigtländer - Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE wins

  • ▲Weight — 1116.00 g less. 414 vs 1530.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Optics

SpecCanon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USMVoigtländer - Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE
Min focal100 mmlead40 mm
Max focal500 mmlead40 mm
Max aperturef/4.5f/1.2
Min aperturef/51f/16

Build

SpecCanon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USMVoigtländer - Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE
Weight1530 g414 glead
Weather sealedⓘtrueleadfalse
Optical stabilizationⓘtrueleadfalse

Mount

SpecCanon - RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USMVoigtländer - Nokton 40mm f/1.2 SE
Lens mountCanon RFleadSony E
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands