Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Canon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

Last updated · How Mars Score works
RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USMCANONILLUSTRATION
Probe A
Canon
RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM
64.6/ 100C
Optics55· 55%
Build78· 35%
Mount—· 10%
150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III V…TAMRONILLUSTRATION
Probe B
Tamron
150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
73.9/ 100B
Optics83· 55%
Build58· 35%
Mount—· 10%
The fork

Where they actually differ

The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.

SpecCanon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USMTamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Weight900 g1725 g
Min focal24 mm150 mm
Max focal70 mm500 mm
Quick verdict

Between the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM and 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD, the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM comes out ahead in weight, while the 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD wins on min focal / max focal. Overall, the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM scores 64.6 and the 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD scores 73.9 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 9.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight. The single most decisive one: Weight — 825.00 g less. 900 vs 1725.

Pick the 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD if you care most about min focal / max focal. Its strongest claims are min focal, max focal. The single most decisive one: Min focal: 150 (vs 24).

Both ship with comparable weather sealed, optical stabilization, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Decision guide

Which should you buy: Canon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM or Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD?

Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD leads the current Mars Score by 9.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare min focal, max focal, weight against the way you will actually use the product.

Choose Canon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM if…

Canon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM has the measurable edge on weight g.

Choose Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD if…

Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD has the measurable edge on focal min mm, focal max mm.

This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.

Why Canon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM wins

  • ▲Weight — 825.00 g less. 900 vs 1725.

Why Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD wins

  • ▲Min focal: 150 (vs 24).
  • ▲Max focal: 500 (vs 70).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Optics

SpecCanon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USMTamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Min focal24 mm150 mmlead
Max focal70 mm500 mmlead
Max aperturef/2.8f/5
Min aperturef/22f/32

Build

SpecCanon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USMTamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Weight900 glead1725 g
Weather sealedⓘtruetrue
Optical stabilizationⓘtruetrue

Mount

SpecCanon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USMTamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Lens mountCanon RFleadSony E
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands