Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Canon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Voigtländer - APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE

Last updated · How Mars Score works
RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USMCANONILLUSTRATION
Probe A
Canon
RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM
64.6/ 100C
Optics55· 55%
Build78· 35%
Mount· 10%
APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SEVOIGTLÄNDERILLUSTRATION
Probe B
Voigtländer
APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE
70.9/ 100B
Optics58· 55%
Build90· 35%
Mount· 10%
The fork

Where they actually differ

The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.

SpecCanon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USMVoigtländer - APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE
Weight900 g364 g
Weather sealedtruefalse
Optical stabilizationtruefalse
Max focal70 mm50 mm
Min focal24 mm50 mm
Quick verdict

Between the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM and APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE, the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM comes out ahead in weather sealed / optical stabilization, while the APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE wins on weight / min focal. Overall, the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM scores 64.6 and the APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE scores 70.9 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE edges ahead on the Mars Score (64.6 vs 70.9), but the 6.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM if you care most about weather sealed / optical stabilization. The biggest gaps in its favor are weather sealed, optical stabilization, max focal. The single most decisive one: Has Weather sealed.

Pick the APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight, min focal. The single most decisive one: Weight — 536.00 g less. 364 vs 900.

There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.

Bottom line: the APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Decision guide

Which should you buy: Canon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM or Voigtländer - APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE?

Voigtländer - APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE leads the current Mars Score by 6.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare min focal, max focal, weight against the way you will actually use the product.

Choose Canon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM if…

Canon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM has the measurable edge on weather sealed, has stabilization, focal max mm.

Choose Voigtländer - APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE if…

Voigtländer - APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE has the measurable edge on weight g, focal min mm.

This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.

Why Canon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM wins

  • Has Weather sealed.
  • Has Optical stabilization.
  • Max focal: 70 (vs 50).

Why Voigtländer - APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE wins

  • Weight — 536.00 g less. 364 vs 900.
  • Min focal: 50 (vs 24).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Optics

SpecCanon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USMVoigtländer - APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE
Min focal24 mm50 mmlead
Max focal70 mmlead50 mm
Max aperturef/2.8f/2
Min aperturef/22f/22

Build

SpecCanon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USMVoigtländer - APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE
Weight900 g364 glead
Weather sealedtrueleadfalse
Optical stabilizationtrueleadfalse

Mount

SpecCanon - RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USMVoigtländer - APO-Lanthar 50mm f/2 SE
Lens mountCanon RFleadSony E
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands