Canon - RF 50mm f/1.2L USM vs Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Canon - RF 50mm f/1.2L USM | Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM |
|---|---|---|
| Min focal | 50 mm | 135 mm |
| Max focal | 50 mm | 135 mm |
Between the RF 50mm f/1.2L USM and FE 135mm f/1.8 GM, the RF 50mm f/1.2L USM comes out ahead in several specs, while the FE 135mm f/1.8 GM wins on min focal / max focal. Overall, the RF 50mm f/1.2L USM scores 65.4 and the FE 135mm f/1.8 GM scores 74.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The FE 135mm f/1.8 GM is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
The RF 50mm f/1.2L USM does not pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec-table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the FE 135mm f/1.8 GM if you care most about min focal / max focal. Its strongest claims are min focal, max focal. The single most decisive one: Min focal: 135 (vs 50).
Both ship with comparable weight, weather sealed, optical stabilization, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the FE 135mm f/1.8 GM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Canon - RF 50mm f/1.2L USM or Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM?
Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM leads the current Mars Score by 8.9 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare min focal, max focal against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Canon - RF 50mm f/1.2L USM if…
Canon - RF 50mm f/1.2L USM does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
Choose Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM if…
Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM has the measurable edge on focal min mm, focal max mm.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Canon - RF 50mm f/1.2L USM wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM wins
- ▲Min focal: 135 (vs 50).
- ▲Max focal: 135 (vs 50).
Spec comparison
Optics
| Spec | Canon - RF 50mm f/1.2L USM | Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM |
|---|---|---|
| Min focal | 50 mm | 135 mmlead |
| Max focal | 50 mm | 135 mmlead |
| Max aperture | f/1.2 | f/1.8 |
| Min aperture | f/16 | f/22 |
Build
| Spec | Canon - RF 50mm f/1.2L USM | Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 950 g | 950 g |
| Weather sealedⓘ | true | true |
| Optical stabilizationⓘ | false | false |
Mount
| Spec | Canon - RF 50mm f/1.2L USM | Sony - FE 135mm f/1.8 GM |
|---|---|---|
| Lens mount | Canon RFlead | Sony E |