Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | LG - G5 OLED evo 77 | Samsung - S90F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Peak brightness | 4000 nits | 1500 nits |
| Screen size | 77 " | 65 " |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Dolby Vision | true | false |
| Smart OS | webOS | Tizen |
| Panel type | OLED | QD-OLED |
Between the G5 OLED evo 77 and S90F QD-OLED 65, the G5 OLED evo 77 comes out ahead in peak brightness / screen size, while the S90F QD-OLED 65 wins on panel type. Overall, the G5 OLED evo 77 scores 82.8 and the S90F QD-OLED 65 scores 72.5 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The G5 OLED evo 77 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 10.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the G5 OLED evo 77 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, screen size, refresh rate, among others. The single most decisive one: Peak brightness — 166.67% more. 4000 nits vs 1500 nits.
Pick the S90F QD-OLED 65 if you care most about panel type. Its strongest claims are panel type. The single most decisive one: Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Both ship with comparable hdmi 2.1 ports, vrr, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the G5 OLED evo 77 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: LG - G5 OLED evo 77 or Samsung - S90F QD-OLED 65?
LG - G5 OLED evo 77 leads the current Mars Score by 10.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size, panel type, refresh rate against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose LG - G5 OLED evo 77 if…
LG - G5 OLED evo 77 has the measurable edge on peak brightness nits, screen size in, refresh rate hz.
Choose Samsung - S90F QD-OLED 65 if…
Samsung - S90F QD-OLED 65 has the measurable edge on panel type.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why LG - G5 OLED evo 77 wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 166.67% more. 4000 nits vs 1500 nits.
- ▲Screen size — 18.46% more. 77 " vs 65 ".
- ▲Refresh rate — 14.58% more. 165 Hz vs 144 Hz.
- ▲Has Dolby Vision.
- ▲Smart OS: webOS (vs Tizen).
Why Samsung - S90F QD-OLED 65 wins
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | LG - G5 OLED evo 77 | Samsung - S90F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 77 "lead | 65 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | OLED | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 165 Hzlead | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 4000 nitslead | 1500 nits |
HDR & Smart
| Spec | LG - G5 OLED evo 77 | Samsung - S90F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Dolby Visionⓘ | truelead | false |
| HDR10+ⓘ | false | truelead |
| Smart OS | webOSlead | Tizen |
| Dolby Atmosⓘ | true | true |
Gaming
| Spec | LG - G5 OLED evo 77 | Samsung - S90F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI 2.1 portsⓘ | 4 | 4 |
| VRRⓘ | true | true |
| ALLM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which is brighter, G5 OLED evo 77 or S90F QD-OLED 65?+
G5 OLED evo 77 peaks at 4000 nits vs 1500 nits.
Which is better for gaming, G5 OLED evo 77 or S90F QD-OLED 65?+
G5 OLED evo 77 offers 165Hz refresh and 4 HDMI 2.1 ports.
Does G5 OLED evo 77 or S90F QD-OLED 65 support Dolby Vision?+
G5 OLED evo 77 supports Dolby Vision; S90F QD-OLED 65 does not.