Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | LG - G5 OLED evo 77 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 77 " | 65 " |
| Peak brightness | 4000 nits | 3800 nits |
| Dolby Vision | true | false |
| Smart OS | webOS | Tizen |
| Panel type | OLED | QD-OLED |
Between the G5 OLED evo 77 and S95F QD-OLED 65, the G5 OLED evo 77 comes out ahead in screen size / peak brightness, while the S95F QD-OLED 65 wins on panel type. Overall, the G5 OLED evo 77 scores 82.8 and the S95F QD-OLED 65 scores 82.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (82.8 vs 82.4). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the G5 OLED evo 77 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are screen size, peak brightness, dolby vision, among others. The single most decisive one: Screen size — 18.46% more. 77 " vs 65 ".
Pick the S95F QD-OLED 65 if you care most about panel type. Its strongest claims are panel type. The single most decisive one: Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, hdmi 2.1 ports, vrr, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: LG - G5 OLED evo 77 or Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65?
LG - G5 OLED evo 77 leads the current Mars Score by 0.4 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size, panel type against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose LG - G5 OLED evo 77 if…
LG - G5 OLED evo 77 has the measurable edge on screen size in, peak brightness nits, has dolby vision.
Choose Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 if…
Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 has the measurable edge on panel type.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why LG - G5 OLED evo 77 wins
- ▲Screen size — 18.46% more. 77 " vs 65 ".
- ▲Peak brightness — 5.26% more. 4000 nits vs 3800 nits.
- ▲Has Dolby Vision.
- ▲Smart OS: webOS (vs Tizen).
Why Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 wins
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | LG - G5 OLED evo 77 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 77 "lead | 65 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | OLED | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 4000 nitslead | 3800 nits |
HDR & Smart
| Spec | LG - G5 OLED evo 77 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Dolby Visionⓘ | truelead | false |
| HDR10+ⓘ | false | truelead |
| Smart OS | webOSlead | Tizen |
| Dolby Atmosⓘ | true | true |
Gaming
| Spec | LG - G5 OLED evo 77 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI 2.1 portsⓘ | 4 | 4 |
| VRRⓘ | true | true |
| ALLM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which is brighter, G5 OLED evo 77 or S95F QD-OLED 65?+
G5 OLED evo 77 peaks at 4000 nits vs 3800 nits.
Which is better for gaming, G5 OLED evo 77 or S95F QD-OLED 65?+
G5 OLED evo 77 offers 165Hz refresh and 4 HDMI 2.1 ports.
Does G5 OLED evo 77 or S95F QD-OLED 65 support Dolby Vision?+
G5 OLED evo 77 supports Dolby Vision; S95F QD-OLED 65 does not.