HP - Reverb G2 (v2) vs Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | HP - Reverb G2 (v2) | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Field of view | 114 ° | 110 ° |
| Eye tracking | false | true |
| Color passthrough | false | true |
| Standalone | false | true |
Between the Reverb G2 (v2) and Galaxy XR (Project Moohan), the Reverb G2 (v2) comes out ahead in field of view, while the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins on eye tracking / color passthrough. Overall, the Reverb G2 (v2) scores 67.8 and the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) scores 72.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) edges ahead on the Mars Score (67.8 vs 72.2), but the 4.4-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Reverb G2 (v2) if you care most about field of view. The biggest gaps in its favor are field of view. The single most decisive one: Field of view — 3.64% more. 114 ° vs 110 °.
Pick the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) if you care most about eye tracking / color passthrough. Its strongest claims are eye tracking, color passthrough, standalone. The single most decisive one: Has Eye tracking.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: HP - Reverb G2 (v2) or Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)?
Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) leads the current Mars Score by 4.4 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare field of view, standalone against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose HP - Reverb G2 (v2) if…
HP - Reverb G2 (v2) has the measurable edge on fov deg.
Choose Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) if…
Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) has the measurable edge on has eye tracking, has passthrough color, is standalone.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why HP - Reverb G2 (v2) wins
- ▲Field of view — 3.64% more. 114 ° vs 110 °.
Why Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins
- ▲Has Eye tracking.
- ▲Has Color passthrough.
- ▲Standalone: true (vs false).
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | HP - Reverb G2 (v2) | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution per eye | 2160x2160 | 3552x3840 |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Field of view | 114 °lead | 110 ° |
| Panelⓘ | LCD | Micro-OLEDlead |
Tracking & Audio
| Spec | HP - Reverb G2 (v2) | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Inside-out tracking | true | true |
| Eye tracking | false | truelead |
| Face tracking | false | truelead |
| Color passthrough | false | truelead |
Compute
| Spec | HP - Reverb G2 (v2) | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Standalone | false | truelead |
| Battery | 0 h | 2.5 hlead |