Meta - Quest Pro vs Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Meta - Quest Pro | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Field of view | 106 ° | 110 ° |
Between the Quest Pro and Galaxy XR (Project Moohan), the Quest Pro comes out ahead in several specs, while the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins on field of view. Overall, the Quest Pro scores 68.1 and the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) scores 72.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) edges ahead on the Mars Score (68.1 vs 72.2), but the 4.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
The Quest Pro does not pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec-table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) if you care most about field of view. Its strongest claims are field of view. The single most decisive one: Field of view — 3.77% more. 110 ° vs 106 °.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, standalone, eye tracking, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Meta - Quest Pro or Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)?
Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) leads the current Mars Score by 4.1 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare field of view against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Meta - Quest Pro if…
Meta - Quest Pro does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
Choose Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) if…
Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) has the measurable edge on fov deg.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Meta - Quest Pro wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins
- ▲Field of view — 3.77% more. 110 ° vs 106 °.
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Meta - Quest Pro | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution per eye | 1800x1920 | 3552x3840 |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Field of view | 106 ° | 110 °lead |
| Panelⓘ | LCD | Micro-OLEDlead |
Tracking & Audio
| Spec | Meta - Quest Pro | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Inside-out tracking | true | true |
| Eye tracking | true | true |
| Face tracking | true | true |
| Color passthrough | true | true |
Compute
| Spec | Meta - Quest Pro | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Standalone | true | true |
| Battery | 2.0 h | 2.5 hlead |