Head-to-head

Meta - Quest Pro vs Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)

Last updated May 31, 2026 · How Mars Score works

Probe A

Which should you buy?

The Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) edges ahead on the Mars Score (58.1 vs 61.1), but the 3.0-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

The Quest Pro doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.

Pick the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) if you care most about field of view. Its strongest claims are field of view.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, standalone, eye tracking, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Meta - Quest Pro wins

No decisive advantages.

Why Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins

▲Field of view — 3.77% more. 110 ° vs 106 °.

Full readout

Spec comparison

Display

Spec	Meta - Quest Pro	Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)
Resolution per eye	1800x1920	3552x3840
Refresh rateⓘ	90 Hz	90 Hz
Field of view	106 °	110 °lead
Panelⓘ	LCD	Micro-OLEDlead

Tracking & Audio

Spec	Meta - Quest Pro	Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)
Inside-out tracking	true	true
Eye tracking	true	true
Face tracking	true	true
Color passthrough	true	true

Compute

Spec	Meta - Quest Pro	Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)
Standalone	true	true
Battery	2.0 h	2.5 hlead

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

Resolution per eye→Refresh rate→Field of view→Panel→Inside-out tracking→Eye tracking→Face tracking→Color passthrough→Standalone→Battery→

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

Meta →3

Samsung →4

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.