Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Nikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S vs Sigma - 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art

Last updated · How Mars Score works
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR SNIKONILLUSTRATION
Probe A
Nikon
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
69.1/ 100B
Optics71· 55%
Build65· 35%
Mount· 10%
35mm f/1.2 DG DN ArtSIGMAILLUSTRATION
Probe B
Sigma
35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art
60.8/ 100C
Optics52· 55%
Build74· 35%
Mount· 10%
The fork

Where they actually differ

The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.

SpecNikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR SSigma - 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art
Weight1440 g1090 g
Optical stabilizationtruefalse
Min focal70 mm35 mm
Max focal200 mm35 mm
Quick verdict

Between the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art, the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S comes out ahead in optical stabilization / min focal, while the 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art wins on weight. Overall, the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S scores 69.1 and the 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art scores 60.8 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.3 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S if you care most about optical stabilization / min focal. The biggest gaps in its favor are optical stabilization, min focal, max focal. The single most decisive one: Has Optical stabilization.

Pick the 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight. The single most decisive one: Weight — 350.00 g less. 1090 vs 1440.

Both ship with comparable weather sealed, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Decision guide

Which should you buy: Nikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or Sigma - 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art?

Nikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S leads the current Mars Score by 8.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare min focal, max focal, weight against the way you will actually use the product.

Choose Nikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S if…

Nikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has the measurable edge on has stabilization, focal min mm, focal max mm.

Choose Sigma - 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art if…

Sigma - 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art has the measurable edge on weight g.

This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.

Why Nikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S wins

  • Has Optical stabilization.
  • Min focal: 70 (vs 35).
  • Max focal: 200 (vs 35).

Why Sigma - 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art wins

  • Weight — 350.00 g less. 1090 vs 1440.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Optics

SpecNikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR SSigma - 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art
Min focal70 mmlead35 mm
Max focal200 mmlead35 mm
Max aperturef/2.8f/1.2
Min aperturef/22f/16

Build

SpecNikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR SSigma - 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art
Weight1440 g1090 glead
Weather sealedtruetrue
Optical stabilizationtrueleadfalse

Mount

SpecNikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR SSigma - 35mm f/1.2 DG DN Art
Lens mountNikon ZleadSony E / L-Mount
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands