Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Nikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S vs Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD

Last updated · How Mars Score works
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR SNIKONILLUSTRATION
Probe A
Nikon
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
69.1/ 100B
Optics71· 55%
Build65· 35%
Mount· 10%
150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III V…TAMRONILLUSTRATION
Probe B
Tamron
150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
73.9/ 100B
Optics83· 55%
Build58· 35%
Mount· 10%
The fork

Where they actually differ

The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.

SpecNikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR STamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Weight1440 g1725 g
Min focal70 mm150 mm
Max focal200 mm500 mm
Quick verdict

Between the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD, the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S comes out ahead in weight, while the 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD wins on min focal / max focal. Overall, the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S scores 69.1 and the 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD scores 73.9 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD edges ahead on the Mars Score (69.1 vs 73.9), but the 4.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight. The single most decisive one: Weight — 285.00 g less. 1440 vs 1725.

Pick the 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD if you care most about min focal / max focal. Its strongest claims are min focal, max focal. The single most decisive one: Min focal: 150 (vs 70).

Both ship with comparable weather sealed, optical stabilization, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Decision guide

Which should you buy: Nikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD?

Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD leads the current Mars Score by 4.8 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare min focal, max focal, weight against the way you will actually use the product.

Choose Nikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S if…

Nikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has the measurable edge on weight g.

Choose Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD if…

Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD has the measurable edge on focal min mm, focal max mm.

This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.

Why Nikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S wins

  • Weight — 285.00 g less. 1440 vs 1725.

Why Tamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD wins

  • Min focal: 150 (vs 70).
  • Max focal: 500 (vs 200).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Optics

SpecNikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR STamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Min focal70 mm150 mmlead
Max focal200 mm500 mmlead
Max aperturef/2.8f/5
Min aperturef/22f/32

Build

SpecNikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR STamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Weight1440 glead1725 g
Weather sealedtruetrue
Optical stabilizationtruetrue

Mount

SpecNikon - NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR STamron - 150-500mm f/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD
Lens mountNikon ZleadSony E
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands