ByteDance - Pico 4 Ultra vs Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | ByteDance - Pico 4 Ultra | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Field of view | 105 ° | 110 ° |
Between the Pico 4 Ultra and Galaxy XR (Project Moohan), the Pico 4 Ultra comes out ahead in several specs, while the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins on field of view. Overall, the Pico 4 Ultra scores 70.6 and the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) scores 72.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (70.6 vs 72.2). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
The Pico 4 Ultra does not pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec-table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) if you care most about field of view. Its strongest claims are field of view. The single most decisive one: Field of view — 4.76% more. 110 ° vs 105 °.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, standalone, eye tracking, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: ByteDance - Pico 4 Ultra or Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)?
Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) leads the current Mars Score by 1.6 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare field of view against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose ByteDance - Pico 4 Ultra if…
ByteDance - Pico 4 Ultra does not lead a decisive measured field here, so choose it for price, ecosystem, design, or availability when those matter more to you.
Choose Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) if…
Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) has the measurable edge on fov deg.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why ByteDance - Pico 4 Ultra wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins
- ▲Field of view — 4.76% more. 110 ° vs 105 °.
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | ByteDance - Pico 4 Ultra | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution per eye | 2160x2160 | 3552x3840 |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Field of view | 105 ° | 110 °lead |
| Panelⓘ | LCD | Micro-OLEDlead |
Tracking & Audio
| Spec | ByteDance - Pico 4 Ultra | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Inside-out tracking | true | true |
| Eye tracking | true | true |
| Face tracking | true | true |
| Color passthrough | true | true |
Compute
| Spec | ByteDance - Pico 4 Ultra | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Standalone | true | true |
| Battery | 2.5 h | 2.5 h |