Pimax - Crystal Super vs Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Pimax - Crystal Super | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Field of view | 135 ° | 110 ° |
| Standalone | false | true |
Between the Crystal Super and Galaxy XR (Project Moohan), the Crystal Super comes out ahead in refresh rate / field of view, while the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins on standalone. Overall, the Crystal Super scores 78 and the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) scores 72.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Crystal Super edges ahead on the Mars Score (78 vs 72.2), but the 5.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Crystal Super if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, field of view. The single most decisive one: Refresh rate — 33.33% more. 120 Hz vs 90 Hz.
Pick the Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) if you care most about standalone. Its strongest claims are standalone. The single most decisive one: Standalone: true (vs false).
Both ship with comparable eye tracking, color passthrough, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Crystal Super is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Pimax - Crystal Super or Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan)?
Pimax - Crystal Super leads the current Mars Score by 5.8 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare refresh rate, field of view, standalone against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Pimax - Crystal Super if…
Pimax - Crystal Super has the measurable edge on refresh rate hz, fov deg.
Choose Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) if…
Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) has the measurable edge on is standalone.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Pimax - Crystal Super wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 33.33% more. 120 Hz vs 90 Hz.
- ▲Field of view — 22.73% more. 135 ° vs 110 °.
Why Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) wins
- ▲Standalone: true (vs false).
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Pimax - Crystal Super | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution per eye | 3840x3840 | 3552x3840 |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hzlead | 90 Hz |
| Field of view | 135 °lead | 110 ° |
| Panelⓘ | QLEDlead | Micro-OLED |
Tracking & Audio
| Spec | Pimax - Crystal Super | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Inside-out tracking | true | true |
| Eye tracking | true | true |
| Face tracking | false | truelead |
| Color passthrough | true | true |
Compute
| Spec | Pimax - Crystal Super | Samsung - Galaxy XR (Project Moohan) |
|---|---|---|
| Standalone | false | truelead |
| Battery | 0 h | 2.5 hlead |