Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | TCL - QM7K Mini-LED 75 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 75 " | 65 " |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3500 nits | 3800 nits |
| Dolby Vision | true | false |
| Smart OS | Google TV | Tizen |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | QD-OLED |
Between the QM7K Mini-LED 75 and S95F QD-OLED 65, the QM7K Mini-LED 75 comes out ahead in screen size / dolby vision, while the S95F QD-OLED 65 wins on refresh rate / peak brightness. Overall, the QM7K Mini-LED 75 scores 76.4 and the S95F QD-OLED 65 scores 82.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The S95F QD-OLED 65 edges ahead on the Mars Score (76.4 vs 82.4), but the 6.0-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the QM7K Mini-LED 75 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are screen size, dolby vision, smart os. The single most decisive one: Screen size — 15.38% more. 75 " vs 65 ".
Pick the S95F QD-OLED 65 if you care most about refresh rate / peak brightness. Its strongest claims are refresh rate, peak brightness, panel type. The single most decisive one: Refresh rate — 14.58% more. 165 Hz vs 144 Hz.
Both ship with comparable hdmi 2.1 ports, vrr, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the S95F QD-OLED 65 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: TCL - QM7K Mini-LED 75 or Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65?
Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 leads the current Mars Score by 6.0 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare screen size, panel type, refresh rate against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose TCL - QM7K Mini-LED 75 if…
TCL - QM7K Mini-LED 75 has the measurable edge on screen size in, has dolby vision, smart os.
Choose Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 if…
Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 has the measurable edge on refresh rate hz, peak brightness nits, panel type.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why TCL - QM7K Mini-LED 75 wins
- ▲Screen size — 15.38% more. 75 " vs 65 ".
- ▲Has Dolby Vision.
- ▲Smart OS: Google TV (vs Tizen).
Why Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 14.58% more. 165 Hz vs 144 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 8.57% more. 3800 nits vs 3500 nits.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs Mini-LED).
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | TCL - QM7K Mini-LED 75 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 75 "lead | 65 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | Mini-LED | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 144 Hz | 165 Hzlead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 3500 nits | 3800 nitslead |
HDR & Smart
| Spec | TCL - QM7K Mini-LED 75 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Dolby Visionⓘ | truelead | false |
| HDR10+ⓘ | true | true |
| Smart OS | Google TVlead | Tizen |
| Dolby Atmosⓘ | true | true |
Gaming
| Spec | TCL - QM7K Mini-LED 75 | Samsung - S95F QD-OLED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI 2.1 portsⓘ | 4 | 4 |
| VRRⓘ | true | true |
| ALLM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which is brighter, QM7K Mini-LED 75 or S95F QD-OLED 65?+
S95F QD-OLED 65 peaks at 3800 nits vs 3500 nits.
Which is better for gaming, QM7K Mini-LED 75 or S95F QD-OLED 65?+
S95F QD-OLED 65 offers 165Hz refresh and 4 HDMI 2.1 ports.
Does QM7K Mini-LED 75 or S95F QD-OLED 65 support Dolby Vision?+
QM7K Mini-LED 75 supports Dolby Vision; S95F QD-OLED 65 does not.