Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 vs Hisense - U7Q Pro Mini LED 65
Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 | Hisense - U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2400 nits | 2200 nits |
| HDMI 2.1 ports | 4 | 2 |
| Dolby Vision | false | true |
| Smart OS | Tizen | Google TV |
Between the QN90F Neo QLED 65 and U7Q Pro Mini LED 65, the QN90F Neo QLED 65 comes out ahead in peak brightness / hdmi 2.1 ports, while the U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 wins on refresh rate / dolby vision. Overall, the QN90F Neo QLED 65 scores 70.3 and the U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 scores 71.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (70.3 vs 71.2). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the QN90F Neo QLED 65 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, hdmi 2.1 ports. The single most decisive one: Peak brightness — 9.09% more. 2400 nits vs 2200 nits.
Pick the U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 if you care most about refresh rate / dolby vision. Its strongest claims are refresh rate, dolby vision, smart os. The single most decisive one: Refresh rate — 14.58% more. 165 Hz vs 144 Hz.
Both ship with comparable screen size, panel type, vrr, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 or Hisense - U7Q Pro Mini LED 65?
Hisense - U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 leads the current Mars Score by 0.9 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare refresh rate, hdmi 2.1 ports against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 if…
Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 has the measurable edge on peak brightness nits, hdmi 2 1 count.
Choose Hisense - U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 if…
Hisense - U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 has the measurable edge on refresh rate hz, has dolby vision, smart os.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 9.09% more. 2400 nits vs 2200 nits.
- ▲HDMI 2.1 ports — 2.00 more. 4 vs 2.
Why Hisense - U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 14.58% more. 165 Hz vs 144 Hz.
- ▲Has Dolby Vision.
- ▲Smart OS: Google TV (vs Tizen).
Spec comparison
Display
| Spec | Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 | Hisense - U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 65 " | 65 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | Mini-LED | Mini-LED |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 144 Hz | 165 Hzlead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2400 nitslead | 2200 nits |
HDR & Smart
| Spec | Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 | Hisense - U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| Dolby Visionⓘ | false | truelead |
| HDR10+ⓘ | true | true |
| Smart OS | Tizen | Google TVlead |
| Dolby Atmosⓘ | true | true |
Gaming
| Spec | Samsung - QN90F Neo QLED 65 | Hisense - U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI 2.1 portsⓘ | 4lead | 2 |
| VRRⓘ | true | true |
| ALLM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which is brighter, QN90F Neo QLED 65 or U7Q Pro Mini LED 65?+
QN90F Neo QLED 65 peaks at 2400 nits vs 2200 nits.
Which is better for gaming, QN90F Neo QLED 65 or U7Q Pro Mini LED 65?+
U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 offers 165Hz refresh and 2 HDMI 2.1 ports.
Does QN90F Neo QLED 65 or U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 support Dolby Vision?+
U7Q Pro Mini LED 65 supports Dolby Vision; QN90F Neo QLED 65 does not.